Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton's take on the 89 situation: Can't accuse him of being a tool of the FO


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I always said that a reporter can be a fan of the team, yet call it like they see it. Well David Newton did exactly that, and came down on Smitty's side on this one.  Yeah, many of us have said that the FO could have handled this situation better, and some have basically given the excuse that G-man was just being honest, and that he didn't know that the reporter was going to ask him that question (or something to that effect).  Well, David Newton's contention is that if G-man and company were thinking these thoughts, they should have communicated with Smith well beforehand:

 

This is a business, but even in business there is room for common decency. If general manager Dave Gettleman and coach Ron Rivera had questions about whether Smith could continue as the team's No. 1 receiver -- or No. 2 or 3 -- they should have discussed it with him during his exit meeting immediately after the season. 

Or at worst, bring him in once they began considering options. 

 

 

I know that I hadn't  thought about the exit interview angle, but it does make sense considering what Smitty has contributed to the team for so many years.  And, no, you can't "hide" your intentions behind the guise of "evaluations" when you're dealing with a player who has given so much to the organization. 

 

Newton also seemed to suggest that the script was flipped on Smitty (in what comes down to a relatively few weeks). 

 

Remember what Rivera and others said about him as he attempted to come back from a late-season knee injury to play against San Francisco in the playoffs? Let me refresh you:

 

  • Rivera: "He works very hard at his craft. That's why he plays at such a high level continually. He's a great example for our young guys in how to practice hard. Steve, again, is still the big vocal point of who we are. When you put the tape on, you still see people matching [defensive backs] on him. You still see teams rolling coverage toward him."
  • Offensive coordinator Mike Shula: "You lose a guy like Steve, it is a big concern because he is such a warrior on game day and a productive player and presents a lot of problems for the defense. Obviously, he gives you a playmaker, but he gives you good looks in other areas to make other guys play better."
  • Tight end Greg Olsen: "He really sets the coverage for us when Steve's out there. It's important. He's our main guy."

In other words, Smith deserves better than he's getting now. 

 

 

 

Within Newton's words, and perhaps what has been lost among many, is that Smitty is a very important part of the veteran leadership, and that voice really can't be replaced, and in a way (perhaps  a small way in some eyes) makes up for his relative diminishing impact on the field.  

 

On an off note, I still think Smitty has a viable game, even with a "lost step".  I think there is something to Eric Davis' assertion that the offense isn't being run through Smitty, even though Smitty can still get behind defenses and is still a play-maker after all these years.  Everyone agrees that he can still get it done in the slot, and should have been in the slot a couple of years ago.  Anyway...

 

 

Maybe that's another reason Smith was so emotional on Wednesday. When Gross told Smith by phone he was retiring, Gross said, "What an unbelievable feeling it is to go out playing for one team and knowing that it was my choice." Words that surely reminded Smith of the way he wants to go out. 

"I think it matters to him," Gross said. 

 

 

Newton ends his article by basically suggesting that it's past time for G-man to stop leaving Smith dangling like an autumn leave hanging on, blowing in the wind.

 

.

But to leave the player speculating seems harsh. 

And not just any player, but one that has meant what Smith has to the organization. 

He deserves better

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman said he is evaluating all players! "What about Smitty" Smitty is being evaluated .. For a second I thought it was a football league run by grown men. Then I remembered it was a drama fest with a bunch of gossiping girls. Smh Sent from my XT1055 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed 100%... I don't quite understand the logic behind how the FO is handling Smitty, the guy has given 110% for the team and is still producing. He has had to deal with not having a legit #2 ever since Moose left, and never complained. Dude deserves to be treated better than what he's getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Hey. The panthers aren't showing their hand whatsoever. Wtf we need a story ( a voice in the background) ' hey gettleman said he is evaluating smitty, like every other player in the roster'... Bingo. Can't wait to break this. Some one go tell Smitty what gentleman said. Its ok to paraphrase nbd. Ask what he thinks. ' so just tell him they are thinking of dumping him?' .. Yeah whatever" (Media, 2014, up an asshole) Sent from my XT1055 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after PO loss: "who do you expect back next year?" DG: "We have to evaluate tape"

 

on WFNZ before combine: "who do you expect back next year?" DG: "We have to evaluate tape"
 
at the combine (tape has been eval'd now): "Does the organization still view Steve Smith as the true #1? [plus thrown in LaFell question]"
 
DG: "[ignores LaFell part]...We're going through the process. Ya know Steve has had a great career, he really has.. and none of us are here forever. But that's not to say.. you know.. well he's part of the evaluation process.. that's just what it is"
 
What an A-hole that guy is. Sounds like he's really out for blood. Just take a listen for yourself
 

https://soundcloud.com/pantherfeez/feb-27-2014-9-07-41-pm

 

edit: why is OP always posting Dave Newton articles? Is that you Dave?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...