Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Contract says smith issue not about money


ajax4132

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/5271/contract-says-smith-issue-not-about-money

 

""""Let's assume the Carolina Panthers' attempt to part with wide receiver Steve Smith is all about money, which it isn't. 

Exactly what does it save? Looking over the contract, here's what it reveals:

  • Trade: This won't happen because Smith's current $7 million cap figure is too high. But if a team were to take Smith, the Panthers would be in the clear.
  • Cut: Carolina would owe Smith $3 million in guaranteed salary. The team also would take a $6 million cap hit in 2015, assuming the release is designated for after June 1, which it would be.
  • Keep: Smith would count, as said above, $7 million against the cap. Bottom line: It's not a huge savings. So that tells you what I've been saying all along, that this isn't about money. It's about the team not believing Smith is the type of leader who will create a healthy environment moving forward."""""""

 

 

Can someone tell me what the fug is going on???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard someone on the radio bring up an interesting point:

 

 

Smith's overriding goal BY FAR is to make the Hall of Fame.  It is not to win games.  It is not to win the Super Bowl.  It's all about his numbers.  He wants to be recognized as one of the GOAT. 

 

Now this is speculation, but maybe that had gotten to be too much behind the scenes. Maybe the MGMT gave Smith the ultimatum of "Take a pay cut, or you're out."  And Smith being Smith, got up and walked out fuming.

 

Like the article states, we don't save much by letting Smith go.

 

There is a lot we don't know going on behind the scenes, and I look forward to finding out what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't about money. People refuse to believe that and trying to explain the contract is too long for the lazy people on here to digest. I'll attempt to summarize as best as possible.

 

There is 9 million in dead money for cutting him. The 6 million in prorated signing bonus(already been paid) rationed out as a 2 million cap hit over the next 3 years = 6 million + 3 million of his 4 million base salary is guaranteed which brings the total cap hit to 9 Million vs the 7 Million he's schedule to count against the cap.

 

If he's on the roster after June 30th we then will pay him another 3 million option bonus that will count 1 million against the cap over the next 3 years.

 

This is why his 2014 cap hit is scheduled to be 7 Million vs his base of 4 + the already exisisting 2 million prorated hit.

 

Cutting him now as a june 1st desgination will save us 2.5 million in space this year but will carry over 4.5 million in dead money to next years cap.

 

Cutting him next year would be a total cap hit of 5 million against the 2015 cap.

 

So bottom line is if we kept him this year the cap hit is going to be 9 million total whether we divide it over 2 years or not. If we cut him next year the combined cap hit from this year and next is 12 million. 

 

The immediate cap relief is 2.5 Million this year and an additional 500k next year by cutting him now vs letting him stay on the team this year.

 

The 500k in savings for next years cap is neglible and trying to replace him for 2.5 million or less isn't feasible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, when you draft a guy you have to understand and realize you're going to be giving him a contract commensurate with that draft position. It is what it is. If you don't want to do that for anyone on the board, trade down. Hell, pull a Vikings and sit on your ass and let the time run out and the next team up pick. LOL! But don't draft the guy and then think you're going to get away with some contract shenanigans. Hell, his agent can't allow it looking out for his own interests. If Stewart was willing to sign a deal wildly out of step with the norm on a bad way his agent would probably tell him he's got a walk. If I want to sign future 1st round draft prospects I can't be a part of this.
    • Yea, I don't know why they are insisting this new clause to be be included. (well its money, its always money). Just the issue, or one of the big issues, is no other team is doing it. They are trying to start a trend..... guess what the team picked right after and before stewart didn't not have this clause in the contract and they have already signed. They totally look like the bad guy in all this and like I posted before, their rep is awful among agents.  Mike Brown uses his daughter negotiate contracts cause she took law courses. Look it up, many say if she is doing that, she is the GM... I bet you can not guess who the GM is....... save you some time, there isn't one.... so maybe it is the daughter....
    • Eh, I can see where you're coming from, but at the same time, unless the new jerseys were just god awful ugly, how many people would just cancel their order at that point? Those people, like myself, bought it because they wanted T-Mac's jersey, not because they loved the current uniforms and just wanted one. But I kinda hope they do give us new uniforms next offseason, just like with Cam, so this version of T-Mac's jersey will always be his "rookie jersey" which would be pretty neat.  It was pretty well known at the time that we were getting new jersey's that next season so I waited to get my Cam until then and got an Authentic one, which is great, but I do still kinda regret not having a Cam rookie jersey in my collection.
×
×
  • Create New...