Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are you Utilizing it Correctly?


Captroop

Recommended Posts

Okay, as a government contractor, I have to listen to the word, "utilize" used incorrectly literally dozens of times a day, and I just want to take a second to clear up how and when it should be used.

 

"Utilize" is NOT synonymous with "Use." You can't just throw it out because it's a fancier, more technical way to say "use." To "utilize" something means using it outside of its intended purpose. For example. You USE a chair when you sit in it a the table. You UTILIZE a chair to change a light bulb. You USE Microsoft word to create a text document, you UTILIZE Microsoft Word if you are using it as a graphic design program.

 

 

But feel free to use this thread to also post words or phrases that people frequently get wrong, and set folks straight on the proper usage.

 

Two more:

Loose vs. Lose.

"Comprised of." "Comprised" is not interchangeable with "Composed." The United States is "composed of" 50 states. And 50 states "comprise" the United States.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Utilize just means to make use of something not previously being used for what you're using it for. It doesn't have to be outside of it's intended use.

You can utilize a chair to sit, provided that it isn't already being used by someone else for seating.

Source: the dictionary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...