Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why we may not need a "No.1", and can draft impact WRs later in this deep class


top dawg

Recommended Posts

OK, there are some (who shall remain nameless) in another thread basically trolling people about the Panthers' ability to get a No. 1 receiver outside of pick 28.  Well, of course there is no perfect science or equation to finding a beast of a receiver because there are too many variables involved, the least of which is luck. But I decided to take a look at last year as a case study to see if his predictions of doom and gloom were warranted. 

 

Now, just for fun, my focus is not going to be on guys that are the true so-called No. 1 receivers in the NFL.  I don't even necessarily like the term because it's subjective and debatable, but I think we can all agree that Calvin Johnson, Demaryius Thomas, A.J. Green and Andre Johnson are the true beasts of the NFL, AND have the body of work that proves it. That being said, it probably is not going to surprise you that they were all drafted in the first round, and all were in the top 10 for receiving yards in 2013. 

 

The good news is that there are other people who were drafted outside of the first round who were very  productive.

 

Dave Gettleman is a self-proclaimed draft guru (for lack of a better term) that has tooted his own horn for his ability to find talent (gems).  Unfortunately we will never know the whole scoop on Gettleman because although he helped find talent, we'll never know who else the Giants had to pass up on come draft day, but we do know that they've had some very talented guys at all positions---enough to compete for and win championships under his watchful eye.  We also know that Gettleman did a pretty good job last year in the draft, especially at our deepest position of need.  Moreover, Ron Rivera's era has not disappointed with picks at the top of the draft (for what it's worth). 

 

But Gettleman aside, if you look at 2013, here are guys NOT drafted in the first round who put up numbers. Of course some were in better circumstances than others, but most WERE the primary focus of opposing defenses last year. And, even guys like Eric Decker, Julian Edelman and Harry Douglas benefited because of another weapon around them (which also means that the WR2 can benefit greatly with another quality guy on the field who is either a true No.1 WR, or at least puts up WR1-like numbers on any given Sunday.

 

Josh Gordon:          the leading receiver in the NFL, 2nd round, supplemental draft

Antonio Brown :      the second leading receiver, 6th round

Alshon Jeffery:        talent and size to be a beast, 2nd round

Pierre Garcon:        top 10, 6th round

Desean Jackson:    top 10, 2nd round

Jordy Nelson:          top 10 with Randall Cobb hurt most of the season, 2nd round

Brandon Marshall:   beast any day of the week, 4th round

Eric Decker;           Broncos WR2 in yardage, average, and TDs, 3rd round

Vincent Jackson:    2nd round

Anquan Boldin:       2nd round

Torrey Smith:         2nd round

T.Y. Hilton:             the real deal, and that's with Reggie Wayne hurt most of the season, 3rd round

Harry Douglas:       filled in for Julio pretty well, and with a hurt Roddy White, 3rd Round 

Julian Edelman:      Pats' effective WR1, 7th round
Keenan Allen:         didn't start until week 3, OROY, 3rd round
Brian Hartline:         still the guy notwithstanding Mike Wallace, 4th round
 
That's your 1000 yard club in 2013 for wide receivers. I left out Jimmy Graham because he isn't a wide receiver, but he was the only TE to gain over 1000 yards.
 
Now, Victor Cruz missed it by a couple of yards in a down year by Eli Manning and the offense, and we all know that our very own Dave Gettleman acquired the UDFA for the Giants.  Marques Colston (7th), Mike Wallace(3rd) and Nate Washington (UDFA) were 900 yard receivers and mostly the primary focus of opposing defenses, or at the very least guys who will produce with another play maker on the field (much like Eric Decker, Jordy Nelson, DeSean Jackson and others).  And, i didn't even mention an undervalued role player like Golden Tate (2nd round) who put up near 900 yards in a ground-game offense without Percy Harvin. Then there's Randall Cobb (2nd Round) who put up nearly 900  yards in 2012 and was well on his way to best that number last year before he got hurt. And, again, there are some names that I didn't mention like Dez Bryant, Larry Fitzgerald, Michael Floyd, Julio Jones, Hakeem Nicks and Cordarelle Patterson (who looks to be an ominous monster), but that's because they were drafted in the first round. Most of them---except for Dez Bryant and the aforementioned No. 1 receivers---weren't in the top 20, so the list above is comprised of very productive guys.
 
So basically there is hope that we can and will get some guys to help us out, even if we don't pick a wide-out at number 28.  And, like many of you said, take the advice of the experts as opposed to someone trolling on  a message board.  The list goes down the line based upon production (as well as the 900 yarders in the paragraph). You may also want to note that not every guy on the list is a tree, or a cheetah.  This draft is deep, and sure guys like Kevin Benjamin, Davante Adams, Donte Moncrief, Allen Robinson, Jarvis Landry, Brandon Coleman, Martavis Bryant, Cody Latimer, John Abbrederis, Devin Street, Robert Herron, and even Matt Hazel may not amount to anything. But, then again, with the size and speed of some of these guys (among a few others), there are reasons to believe that they can be productive NFL receivers.  There is a reason why the experts---not necessarily all the talking heads, but the scouts and GMs as well---are saying this is one of the deepest classes of wide receivers in years.
 
Lastly, I would love for someone to do a list for offensive tackles, as some are also alluding to the fact that it's foolish to think that we will be able to draft a quality starting tackle as well outside of the first round.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wanted to add that hardly ANY of even the most elite recievers made it to 1,000 yards their first season, AJ green is the only one who has that out of those I think and barley does at that.. It takes a while for recievers to really make an impact, and I am not just talking about recieving yards, I am talking about contributing to winning, which includes more than just yards. Smitty for example was an excellent blocker.

 

Basically what I am saying is that, knowing how the huddle thinks, everyone needs to calm down an stop expecting a reciever in the first round, or any round to come in right away and be a game changer, it could happen but rarely happens that way and I know that is what the huddle is expecting.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to read ALLL THAT just to hear why we MAYYBE may not when we deff do.  If it were shorter I'd read it, but for now I'll just stick to the far more obvious reasons.

 

A great powerful target for Cam to rely on in future years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to read ALLL THAT just to hear why we MAYYBE may not when we deff do.  If it were shorter I'd read it, but for now I'll just stick to the far more obvious reasons.

 

A great powerful target for Cam to rely on in future years.

I'd rather to protect Cam first so that we can rely on him for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of these players were pleasant surprises for teams who already had #1s. They didn't completely gut their WRs corps and then stake their entire offense on finding a superstar UDFA.

 

The point is is these guys were the cream of the crop in 2013, regardless of whether or not they were opposite WR1s or not.  I only see five to six on the list who played on teams that already have/had WR1s, and that's even where you include both Brandon Marshall and Alshon Jeffery.

 

T.Y. Hilton played most of the season without Reggie Wayne. Jordy Nelson played without Randall Cobb most of the season as well. Arguably, it's getting to the point where with them that the lines are blurred as to who the WR1 on their teams are.  

 

The thing is is that the guys produced regardless of the circumstances. Even if they weren't in fact the number 1 target on the team, they still produced which is what an effective second receiving target on the team gets paid to do.  I want a WR2 who can punish the defense when left alone.  I would like a WR2 who can effectively play as the WR1 if the top guy goes down.

 

Hell, in a perfect world my WR3 would do the same, but an effective WR3 should at least be able to take advantage of mismatches when the other guys are drawing the fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather to protect Cam first so that we can rely on him for years to come.

The problem is BPA philosophy works better for WR in this draft.

Getting Cam protection is important but this draft is better filled with weapons. Which is also a big need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wanted to add that hardly ANY of even the most elite recievers made it to 1,000 yards their first season, AJ green is the only one who has that out of those I think and barley does at that.. It takes a while for recievers to really make an impact, and I am not just talking about recieving yards, I am talking about contributing to winning, which includes more than just yards. Smitty for example was an excellent blocker.

 

Basically what I am saying is that, knowing how the huddle thinks, everyone needs to calm down an stop expecting a reciever in the first round, or any round to come in right away and be a game changer, it could happen but rarely happens that way and I know that is what the huddle is expecting.

 

Well, you're probably right.  But I would hope to think that after being preached to and educated for weeks on end that people would temper their expectations.

 

Cordarelle Patterson is scary. He started late, but began to come on more and more. He was a project coming into the draft, as were players like Alshon Jeffery and Michael Floyd. But all of them were starting to get it by the second half of last season, and will probably grow even more to varying degrees. And, to not leave the little guys out, T.Y. Hilton, Antonio Brown, and D-Jax (and maybe Randall Cobb) probably showed even more of an initial flash their first years, but still didn't really break out until year two.

 

Patience is a virtue.

 

That's why I am kind of torn on Benjamin. If he has more potential to be beast---a true No. 1 of the NFL (as opposed to a bust like Stephen Hill), then I think that we should take him, regardless if he'll be ready to be a day-one starter or not. The thing is is that I don't know if G-man would see it that way.  Elite guys don't come along every day.  I could easily see G-man going for the now, as opposed to the later as it pertains to Benjamin.  Of course the point is moot if Benjamin doesn't do well at his workouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...