Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I THINK the Panthers will seek trade for new DT


hdevonxz

Recommended Posts

possible solution: throw brayton in @ DT and start CJ and LE. Brayton played DT in Oakland and was projected to play some DT in passing downs... thoughts?

that's probably going to have to happen unfortunately. it's a shame because brayton was really coming on in the second half of the season.

another thought that no one is entertaining is trading away charles Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good a time as any to see if our rook's can step up in camp with first team reps. I like Irvin myself, but then I also just predicted that Kemo's injury was not serious. Very interested to see what Beason's next blog says about the rookie DT's. You know it's coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have ZERO to trade this late in the game. We are going to have to hope that Fox has had his eye on someone for a while knowing that DT depth could be a problem...a guy that could be had for very little and a guy that could produce a lot.

If they are really in "win now to save our job" mode then I could see us trying to pry Rogers away from the Browns but it would cost us dearly. I'm not even sure I'd want to trade that much of our future away when Rogers is injury prone and we already don't have a first rounder for 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have ZERO to trade this late in the game.

like i've said earlier, we have a potential starting middle linebacker from pennsylvania who'd i suspect we could trade to philly if they had a DT we needed. However, the only one we could probably get is trevor laws who's currently nicked up and a little small.

There's also charles johnson now that we have browns.

If they are really in "win now to save our job" mode then I could see us trying to pry Rogers away from the Browns but it would cost us dearly. I'm not even sure I'd want to trade that much of our future away when Rogers is injury prone and we already don't have a first rounder for 2010.

Rogers missed 10 games 3 years ago and that's about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade for someone it will be like the harris deal. We will pick up a young guy working on his rookie contract with perhaps one or two years left, no big guaranteed money or signing bonus. He will have starting experience but will be considered an extra guy. Maybe someone who started due to an injury to the incumbent who is back.

By picking a relatively cheap guy with no big signing bonus, it won't hurt the team trading him away and will cost us the draft pick, maybe a 4th or 5th rounder and little to no money since we pick up the contract. We can still fit him under the cap and next year either renegotiate or let him go with little consequence.

Who is he? I haven't a clue but I bet the Panthers do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bears have a plethora of DTs, and the 2 teams have a history of making trades, so I wouldn't rule out something like that happening. It also helps that they both run the same general defense...

I thought of that too. Depends on the dynamics.

(more elsewhere)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm 95% sure they are going to make a move, some way or another, whether by trade or FA acquisition.

this is our area of the least depth. behind our starters there are absolutely no proven commodities.

in 07 Minter retired and we were left in the same situation at safety. then Hurney makes a move for Harris. we made a trade for a safety, a good one btw, when safety is one of Fox and Hurney's lowest priorities historically. Now the same thing is happening with our DTs, and with Fox being an avid front four fan, it's only a matter of time before we hear of a trade or a signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think they are holding back to see what they have in the young guys, but I think it's a near certainty at some point they will bring someone else in. Right now (assuming we keep 5 CBs which is normal), the top 5 IMO are: 1) Jaycee Horn 2) Mike Jackson 3) Chau Smith-Wade 4) Shemar Bartholomew  5) Akayleb Evans   Obviously Jaycee is the alpha in that room and paid as such. Need him to stay healthy and continue to play at a Pro-Bowl level. Mike Jack did pretty well all things considered last year, and they gave him lower-level starter money. Fair deal for both sides.  Smith-Wade showed some promise as a slot CB. I think low-key he's a lock for the team. Different size and skill set than the other CBs. Shemar Bartholomew was the most sought after waiver claim last preseason. Was 5th CB most and inactive most of last year. Had a few defensive and ST snaps. Nothing of note good or bad but too small a sample size to make any judgment. Akayleb Evans was a 2022 4th Rounder for the Vikings. Has started 19 games (including Week 18 for the Panthers) in his career and played in 43. Was pretty good in 2023 before getting injured and falling down the depth chart last year. There's some other guys on the outside looking in, but until they show more in training camp I dont see anyway they make the 53. And only Jaycee, Mike Jack, and Smith-Wade are locks to make this roster IMO.  
    • Was just reading the Ask the Old Guy story on the team's website and was shocked to see that only two 2nd Rounders have signed so far, 30 of them haven't. That isn't normal, the Texans really screwed things up for the rest of the league, no other explanation that I can think of for 30 of the 32 picks to still be unsigned at this point.
    • They need to address CB before season starts. This is not going to cut it. 
×
×
  • Create New...