Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Meeting with Adams for 2nd Time


Soul Rebel

Recommended Posts

If you think he won't last until 60 and you really want him then you pick him at 28.  Otherwise you have to be fine with him not being there at 60 and going a different direction.  To those who say you can just move up in the second to get him, yes you might be able to but you have to know that he could go at 29 or any other place before you can hop back in.

 

I kind of like Kelvin Benjamin as a solution to our wide receiver/tight end issue. as well.  He is going to develop into a big play guy in a few years.  The only question is whether we want to wait for him to develop or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. I don't know why people continue to think a lot of these guys will last to 60. Its a good chance it won't happen.

 

Lol, teams actually address other positions in the draft than WR you know?

This is the deepest WR-draft in a long long time and there WILL be a great talent at WR available when we pick at 60. It is ridiculous how some guys think that all guys, that we are interested in will be gone by the time we pick in round 1 and 2..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

id lose it if we take adams at 28. we had better hit a homerun with the OL picks in the 2nd and 3rd.

They are not going to start 2 rookie olinemen unless injuries happen. No matter who they pick. They brought to many players back who have been in the system to do that.

You should be happy if they get 1 solid starters on the Olinemen from this draft who can start year 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10-12 WRs i can see go before #60.in no order.

 

1. Watkins

2. Evans

3. Beckham

4. Cooks

5. Lee

6. Benjamin

7. Latimer

8. Matthews

9. Robinson

10. Landry

11. Adams

12. Moncrief

13. Bryant/ Richardson

 

teams that have been rumored at wanting a WR are the Rams, Browns, Bucs, Eagles, Ravens, Jets, 49ers, Seahawks, Chiefs, Raiders, Redskins, Colts, Chargers and even the Dolphins/Titans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pauline also said this

 

 

The Panthers are "very high" on Nevada OL Joel Bitonio, according to draft insider Tony Pauline.

Per Pauline, the Panther have visited Bitonio on two separate occasions and the Bucs are "enamored" with his skills. Bitonio projects at tackle or guard, and he did very well on an island this year against Anthony Barr and Demarcus Lawrence. The end of the first-round is a real possibility.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...