All Activity

If we win at NO and the home game against Tampa, I say we rest our starters and do 2 weeks of prep for Tampa (and just ignore watching film on Seattle). Extra plus out of that is not giving Seattle any meaningful tape if we meet them in the playoffs. That being said, 1) we probably don't win both those games with how Jekyll & Hyde we are, and 2) I doubt DC rests our starters

Rams getting ready offer 3 first round picks and a couple of second rounders this off season.

Cool, keep us at 1 pm and keep us far away from national primetime games. Don't need another Bryce primetime debacle like the 49ers game.

...it's like Kannapolis with a few tall buildings.

Staal

Hopefully we get the Bus in net.

Learning? He's always been a big philanthropist.

Give them Bryce, Legette and Dalton back.

Fire alarms need to be pulled. Payback time.

If we get into a situation where the Seattle game doesn’t matter, would Canales rest starters for the away Tampa game? There will be a lot more clarity after the game tonight and our game Sunday to these scenarios, but there is a chance where the Seattle game means nothing.

Somewhat ironically, BYU, previously before joining a reformulated Big 12, was also an Independent.

2.9 of that being guaranteed

We'll all like him til Bryce gets a 10 year, $3 billion extension.

I will hold off judgement until its time to make a decision on Bryce`s future.

Give me Fly tonight

https://x.com/dashawnwsoc9/status/1998798810127151270?s=46 praising Morgan praising Canales Talking about Christmas trees he’s getting it

Maybe he shouldn’t have tried to be a GM and blow the cap on him and 2 WRs

Talk is cheap Actions are needed

2 things 1. Bryce has gotten more time and opportunity than literally every QB you named 2. You went to a prior era where QBs got more time than today’s NFL (and again, Bryce has gotten more time and opportunity than everyone you named) Bryce - 40 starts and counting Gabbert - 27 starts and the Jags ended it Russell - 25 starts and the Raiders ended it Locker - 23 starts and the Titans ended it the team around Bryce has gotten significantly better. Bryce is more the same than he is different. Tune in this week, as we count down late in the 4th quarter to see if Bryce can somehow manage to crack 200 yards!! I mean you don’t have to tune in for that. Odds say he won’t because it’s a really rare feat him. As a 3rd year player there is a 75% chance he won’t.

The Bryce hate on this site is crazy, we got 2 important AF games upcoming and all they can do is whine about the Qb, who has been playing pretty good. Panthers' fans are crazy and toxic i guess.

We going to have to figure out the pass rush situation. Being 31 in sacks doesn't help. We won't go far if we can't figure it out. The one thing about this defensive system that aggravates me to no end. Panthers football takes pride in hitting the opposing teams Qb.

Got a Wine and Cheese owner to go with the wine and cheese fan base in Charlotte. Also, Fug Tepper.

Also, just for clarity, is this thread meant for general discussion of Bryce Young, or discussion of General Bryce Young?

The word I feel most comfortable using as a descriptor is "inconsistent". Haven't really seen anyone disagree with that. Consistency being one of the things I value most in a player, that makes me lean toward moving on. But he does still have both time and opportunity to prove otherwise. Mind you, having a streaky quarterback isn't exactly a new thing in Charlotte (you could argue it's been the norm). Delhomme was notorious for starting slow but finishing strong. He could sadly also find hos way into ruts that were difficult to crawl out of. Newton, on the other hand, was often known to start hot but fade late (the vast majority of the 2015 season followed that pattern) though it could be argued that was a team pattern as much as it was Cam's. There are definitely some fans for whom this is always going to be a bridge too far. (or too short) Realistically, it's not impossible that he could still have a good career even with those issues. It's a damn sight more difficult, though. And arguably, less likely.

Oh, I did, and they weren't based in emotions either. Granted, characterizing them that way gives you an easy out to avoid responding to them. Similar tactic to dismissing the other guy's points with "nah, you didn't really watch the games" which saves you having to debate what he said. Strikes me as a kinda lazy way to go, but hey both elements are still back there if you feel up to trying later.