All Activity
- Past hour
-
Hornets have clinched a winning record
-
I’ve already given up getting the 5th or 6th seed
- Today
-
No you didn’t. But whatever.
-
Somehow the East is so much improved as of late. They are beating GOOD West teams.
-
Sad thing is everyone else is winning atm tonight
-
18 wins by 20+ points this season
-
Tough 4 games to close out. Did what we was supposed to do against Indy. The fellas need to close out this season strong
-
You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1. I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter. So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate. QBs are a great example. Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith. Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there? Wharton (280lbs)? So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover? A deep free safety? A quality center? A playmaking TE? A DT to replace Robinson? A wide receiver to balance the secondary? Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right. Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.
-
Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign
strato replied to PanthersATL's topic in Carolina Panthers
Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. -
We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea
-
I'm a 4-3 guy. I just dont see this team switching to a 4-3. Refuse to lie to myself.
-
Dave Canales: the next rockstar head coach
Butterflyj30 replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
Who would Dave and Dan leave in Charge of Practice and the Browns Coach doesn't even know the team lol -
Yeah he tries to be too descriptive and makes a mess of it and gets behind.
-
Sion James is the leading scorer at halftime with 13 points.
-
Would also be nice if Brooklyn can somehow pull off the upset of Atlanta and the Timberwolves can beat the 76ers.
-
Hornets leading by 19 at half 69-50.
-
69 at the half.
-
Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign
MHS831 replied to PanthersATL's topic in Carolina Panthers
Nuff said. - Yesterday
-
Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign
T-Wazzle replied to PanthersATL's topic in Carolina Panthers
If I can't change the nonsensical name of this team, I don't want to play -
I think, based on what I guess GMs are thinking, that he is LT #2. He sure takes a steep drop vs. speed rushers--that bothers me, but hey, you get it back in other ways. I would be happy if that is what they think we need to do. To me, it would me that they are not expecting Ickey to return to form OR Moton's knee is worse than we hoped. (reading tea leaves).
-
Tony Pauline’s 2026 NFL Mock Draft 4.0
raleigh-panther replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
Tyson has an injury history no. Just no. NO
-
Member Statistics
