MHS831

Check out Cincinnati's Golday. I am seeing Lukish qualities (smarts, size, speed, etc)

My first reaction was, "As a head coach, this could be a career buster." He must have confidence in the QB--

I will be honest--I wonder if the decision to try to score at the end of the half--the Allen Fumble FG play--was the deal breaker. Now I am back to being dishonest.

the only way he comes here is if they fire Canales. Now that McD might be an option, one never know how one might view one situation over an other one once you realize that you can only have one head coach once.

stuck the ball in his facemask. Took the jaws of life to get it out.

Here is how I see it: Hendrickson is 4-5 years past the normal prime for an edge rusher. However, the smart, elite edge rushers can play into their 30s. So we would be taking a risk against the odds. I see him as an elite, smart player, but in 2025, he only played an average of 15 snaps per game. We'd be paying him about 1.5 million per game, or $100,000 per snap at that rate. Hendrickson is 270, which makes him a guy who can rush inside or outside, hold the edge, and thus, be productive vs. the pass or run. We have 2 guys (Scourton and Jones II) who do that pretty well. Jones' salary is $10m. I see our need as a pass-rushing specialist, hoping that Princely picks up that role rotationally at least, in 2026. Here is what AI says about age, and it does not lie: An NFL edge rusher's prime typically falls between ages 24 and 28, with peak production often seen around 27, though elite players maintain high production into their early 30s, with some legends excelling even later, demonstrating that while decline can start, great pass rushers defy age norms and can sustain elite play. Peak Production Trends Early 20s (21-23): Players develop, with younger cohorts showing less immediate impact, but 23-year-olds often show significant pressure generation. Mid-to-Late 20s (24-28): This is the sweet spot, with the 27-year-old age group frequently leading the league in pressures and elite seasons occurring in this window. Early 30s (30+): While some decline begins, many top edge rushers remain highly effective, with stars like T.J. Watt and Myles Garrett demonstrating exceptional play well past 30, defying the average career trajectory. Key Factors Physicality & Technique: Edge rushers need strength and speed, but mastery of pass-rush moves often develops later, allowing for sustained success. Individual Variation: Elite players like Bruce Smith and T.J. Watt show that exceptional talent and health can extend prime years significantly, with some even having more sacks after 30 than before.

I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran). We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17. He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28. Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times. Basically, he was a situational pass rusher. He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures. He should improve, but for now, he is what he is. Scourton gives us hope. For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge. He played at a first-round draft pick level. He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks. For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni. However, I see it this way: Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level. He is a liability, if you ask me. Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher. I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw. Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable. I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher. Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth. A third developmental player is not ideal. Draft: OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency: Edge, possibly a WR; re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman. Let walk: Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle. I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth. Spend it on a veteran edge. Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range. We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.

Serious question: Who was the backup center when Mays was C and Corbett and BC were out (I think both were out in September-October.) That might give some indication of how they approach the C position depth. (DId they bring Corbett back when BC went down?)

Same page.

If we sign Mays and BC, I bet we do nothing at C---even if BC will not be ready until October or so. Not sure I like the plan, they are a bit light in the loafers. All are developmental too. I am higher on Mays than most, fwiw, because at 26 he is entering his prime and he has been improving since settling into one position. I think he is going to be solid and he does a lot of things well. There are days, however, when I want A gap more secure--I won't lie. Mays could test the waters, in fact. If I were him, I would. He was released, re-signed, put behind Corbett twice when he was arguably better. C will be interesting.

I think we have to go edge in free agency now if we can find one, and maybe LB.

I think the combine separates OTs as much or more than any other position. I think we will be drafting a T from utah.

I agree. Just not sure about all the dynamics. I know his relationship with Watson was dysfunctional, Myles talked about wanting out, etc. However, I am not sure how versatile he is. Specifically, who was out of position in your estimation? What adjustments did you want to see against what teams? I did not keep up with the Browns like you did, so I am just curious.I do, however, agree 100% with your premise. For the past year, I have been working 60 hours per week, so I am out of the loop.

I think it is funny that we label coaches without considering their circumstances. Bill Belichick has a .449 winning percentage as a head coach when Tom Brady was not under center. He will be a Hall of Fame coach. Stephanski, on the other hand, was asked to function in the shadow of the Watson crippling signing, one that he opposed (as it came out recently). I am not quite sure what to think of him, but I am not dismissing him as a bad coach. He had the worst situation in the NFL the entire time he worked there. Frustrations mounted between him and the players over the six years he was there, but the dysfunction was manufactured in the front office.

Did they get a new GM too? That Cousins signing before drafting a Q--after drating TE and RB in round 1 for the past two years or so--what?