MHS831

They had the abbreviated airport name on the chest--ATL Which I translated to mean "Another terrible Loss" -- I suggested that they put "28-3" on their sleeves to commemorate their last Super Bowl appearance, but they rejected my proposal.

I definitely see your point, but the issue to me is this: Do we have the immediate urgency right now to draft a T in round 1 when there are other positions that could use starters from the draft? Secondly, I find this draft to be weak this year, with about 14 players with first round grades (arguably). I do not think the OTs in this draft are average, but there are more of them considered to be first round candidates based on the weakness of this draft. Since we have 2 proven starters, maybe we should draft a project later and if we have the need next year, draft the OT then? Your facts are indisputable, but we have to take our situation and the availability of talent at OT in 2026. This is a very debatable topic--so I definitely see your view.

It kinda looks like a generic Cardinals uniform to me. I guess the news is they are ditching the black jerseys. And I think this will be their alternative helmet:

Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do. After that, let's say Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker. That too is truth. Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL, but drafting a first-round OT now is either wasting the money we just paid for a free agent OR it is like paying top dollar for a new car and keeping it in your garage for a season. A first rounder should give us 4-5 years of cap relief by playing from day 1. I shall elaborate here: Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT. This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft. Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value. So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way. Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms. Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced). "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact." Austin Barber (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools. Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game. Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft. His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT. He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands. I think he has the best upside and value for this offense. Dametrious Crownover TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools. "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited." THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. Isaiah World (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th). World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall. For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season. Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before, so why not grab a player with upside?

Personally, I don't think so. Here is why: Blocking--our T situation could need help. A 245 lb back can help. If we keep a RB in to block and release, we are able to release a TE without chipping the speed rusher more. It sure seems as if we are going to address a pass-catching TE. Short yardage.

yep, and how many combinations of the OL did we have last year? Our free agents are decent, but they could digress in this offense.

hes a good fit

IN the past, 2 have been enough in carolina==with a sure-handed slot.

XL should feel like crap. Anyone with his skills should be successful by now. Instead, we need 3 quality WRs that other teams fear. If not, TMac gets doubled. Coker? does not really run the entire route tree. We need 3...

Another thing--Dan tips his hand a bit when he loads one side of the ball in free agency--then he uses the draft. He addressed Edge, LB, S, with starting-level players. On offense, he let starters Mays and Rico go-- we lost Nijman, and Ickey, XL is possibly a bust--it makes sense that he leans into the offense this draft.

Yet we mocked you. Look who's laughing now! I am still not TE warm, but I sense they might take a duck. He would change the offensive packages more than any other position, imo.

RBs, WRs, and OL who can tackle? Just kidding. On a roll.

And now you know why I broke up with her---she sounds nasal at times. Once I told a joke and when she was laughing, she snorted. Deal breaker.

that is mine--he could drop to 10 or so--if so, we could. I also think we are looking at moving Smith Wade to FS--and if so, we could daft a CB. But if downs falls, he is the pick.

I think they like him---that will tell us a lot about XL. My shock move? trade up for an Ohio State player (Styles or Downs)