MHS831

and he is running with his arms going across his body--that costs you speed. Hands should be front to back, not side to side. And yes, keep your limbs within your frame on a pass route--throwing your hand out is a tell and it is wasted motion. not only does it give away the route, but nobody ever caught a ball with their hands 3 feet apart. Still, I like him. Lets see if they take those flaws out of his game. I get the feeling that he may not have been the primary focus at CU, so we shall see.

The bottom of the roster was horrible in 2024. I see 2 winnable spots at CB behind Horn, Jackson, Smith-Wade. Evans and Bartholomew were on the roster at the end of the season and will have to defend their spots from Broughton, Thornton and Reid. (I like Reid) I see a safety spot going to an UDFA. We have three in the mix--don't sleep on Jack Henderson. Martin-Scott and Nomura have shots at LB. Fitzgerald is probably our next kicker Tarquin could be kept to develop RT dept moving forward post Moton I will predict that 4 UDFAs from this list make the roster if it stays pretty much the same. It is a good group.

Yes--I think that is what they are doing. Both Safeties have the ability to play deep. When the coaches were asked, they said the same things about both Safeties. I am not sure that we are going to have a pure free safety.

Horn looks quick and he seems to be humble--he sounds like Armanti Edwards when he talks--The thing that impresses me about Horn is his balance and his speed out of breaks. Watch again and see what I mean. This guy could be a gem.

The difference between the edge players in the first round and those found as late as round 3 was not significant. Morgan was very smart not to take a question mark edge at 8 when he may have picked two who have more upside at edge.

I think Walker is a great kid and could become a great player if used correctly. However, we needed edge help and as an edge, he was not a top 10 player. I think players like Micah Parsons give GMs visions of similar returns, but Walker's value lies in his versatility. There was a time when I wanted him--not going to lie--but I preferred trading back more. At #8, I just could not find a player worth that high a pick that checked all the boxes.

I mean, if Clowney was playing lights out, an edge making $10m is a bargain. He would not be upset if there were other teams with open wallets waiting to give him a 2-3 year deal. He was a stop gap, and now our developmental talent needs some sunlight. If Clowney were to stay and have a good year, he is a 33-year old free agent. If our two draft picks get a combined 12-15 sacks, then you know that they got more production at the edge position for less money and we are building. Clowney has flashed. He is a great specimen and tremendous football player. His mindset is not a dawg, however.

There is a real science to it that involves math and if you don't know the language, you are history (see what I did there?) . You need soldiers before you need generals--Morgan did a great job in this draft, imo. He wanted to trade back--more picks. Yes, most of the picks will not pan out, but most of the NFL starters were not first round picks. Free agency is like dealing with a loan shark to make the house payment--you have to draft strategically.

Suggestion: If it is too long for you and you can't read it, don't comment on it. Your uniformed opinion is not required.

Sorta related. I just looked up a stat: Success rates for NFL draft's second rounders. I was surprised that it is 49%. The success rate for first rounders is 58%. Here success does not mean those that did not bust, it means that roughly half of the players selected in the second round become full-time starters at some point in their careers. Busts do that too. However, considering the fact that a first round talent is worth up to 1800 points (first overall pick) more than the first pick of the second round and as low as 350 points (last pick in first round) higher than the last pick in round 2, it seems there could be cases in which it would be to your advantage to trade out of round 1 and draft two or three second rounders for the value. Of course, the elite players are likely to be gone, and some positions overwhelmingly suck after round 1 (traditionally, like QB or LT, for example), but if you need to find starters at positions like DT, G, LB, S, C, TE, RB, etc, there could be a time when you trade back for more starters. I was surprised that the margin between rounds 1 and 2 was only 9%. While I realize that some of you sofa scholars are thinking, "Well duh? Trading back gives you more players." as you wipe the Cheetos off your shirt. Not the point. The point is you have to consider the draft,the needs (and the number of them), and you need to scout the second and third rounds like you do the first, the cap, and the long-term impact. If you can find 2 players with a 49% chance of becoming a starter, are you better off than drafting one player who has a 58% chance in the long term? So if I traded away my first rounder for two second rounders (a trade most teams would make) regularly, when I got 10 second rounders (by trading 5 first rounders), 5 would be starters. If I did not trade and kept my 5 first rounders, 3 would be starters. Furthermore, their rookie contracts would be much cheaper than the 5 first rounders.

I see several players who could make this roster. This is a pretty impressive group of free agents--no "home runs" like Coker last year, but I see OL help (probably going to PS) I see a safety and LB and CB or two making this roster. After the mini camp today and tomorrow, you might see a few more roster cuts. That will give us some idea of what they see down the road.

I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts. You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well. Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense: In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.

we are thin in a few areas. I still think they think we are set at edge. We still have DJ and Barno and one could go to the PS. Edge is one of those positions, for some reason, where if you do not draft the right guy or break the bank, you gotta go with what you have. Personally, I think our 2 draft picks will be fine. SEC kids. Jones and Wonnum are adequate vets who are not so good they will steal playing time from the toddlers. Three rookies (including Mwansa, who could play special teams while developing as an edge) behind 2 vets is huge, but don't forget, we had a veteran group of DTs, DEs, and LBs. On the back end of the defense, all veterans (starting) except maybe Ransom.

No need with Dowdle and Etienne behind Hubbard.