Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Hardy advance


DaCityKats

Recommended Posts

 

The Panthers have agreed to pay RE Greg Hardy a $1.3 million salary advance in order to get him to participate in the offseason program.

Hardy will get paid weekly throughout the offseason under the minor contract restructuring. The $1.3 million represents roughly ten percent of his $13.116 million base salary for 2014 under the franchise tag. The Panthers and Hardy have until July 15 to reach a long-term deal.

 

i wonder what this says about contract talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think Hardy will accept a contract less than CJ's for the mere fact I'm sure he believes in his mind he is better than him, or at least just as good.  I would be more surprised to see a deal reached than i would a trade.  Only way I can see him accepting it is if he tests FA next year, and doesnt get offered as much, but not until then.  Would love to be wrong btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offseason workouts are not mandatory and there have been football players who are hurt while participating.  So I can understand that he might not want to do them without some payment.  He knows that come the Fall he will be getting almost 1 million a game and his pay under his old contract was not that great compared to what he is getting now.  I don't think it means that things are not working out or that Hardy is being a butt.  The fact they worked things out could be good news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Panthers defensive end Greg Hardypounced on his one-year, $13.1 million franchise tender, he left open the possibility of staying away from voluntary offseason workouts for leverage in talks toward a long-term deal.

He won’t be staying away, and the Panthers have given him $1.3 million reasons to show up.

Per a league source, the Panthers and Hardy have agreed to formula pursuant to which Hardy can earn an advance of $1.3 million by showing up for the full offseason program.  Hardy will get paid by the week throughout the offseason program.

Absent such an arrangement, Hardy wouldn’t have gotten any of his $13.1 million until September.  So he can make roughly 10 percent of his 2014 salary now, simply by doing that which he already had an incentive to do — prepare to have a monster season in advance of hitting the market.  (Unless, of course, the Panthers choose to tag him again in 2015, at $15.72 million.)

For a guy who completed a slotted sixth-round contract, $1.3 million matches the most he has made in any of his four NFL seasons.

It’s technically a restructuring of Hardy’s contract.  A second restructuring will be permitted only if the cap number goes down or stays the same, which won’t be an issued if/when a long-term deal is negotiated.  Typically, franchise players see their cap numbers drop when a long-term deal is signed, thanks to the proration of signing bonus money.

Hardy and the Panthers have until July 15 to strike a long-term contract.  Otherwise, he will play in 2014 under the one-year franchise tender.

The deal makes plenty of sense.  The Panthers will have him present for the offseason program, Hardy will be preparing for the season, he’ll get a nice chunk of money now in order to do so, and he’s ultimately protected against any injury that could happen in the offseason because his full $13.1 million salary is guaranteed.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/04/28/greg-hardy-will-get-up-to-1-3-million-advance-for-participating-in-offseason-program/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can give him a CJ contract as long as we don't guarantee most of it.  I remember when Haynesworth got a 100 million contract and in the end only received 40 million of it.

 

How much of that $40 million do you think Fat Albert has left? #purpledrank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were going to attempt to trade Hardy then why would we be advancing his salary? WIth no advance, if a trade succeeds at some point later in the off-season then his next team would be responsible for his full contract. But if we're paying him 1.3 now, that money wouldn't be reimbursed to us or credited to our cap if he's traded, right? That 1.3 million would, in essence, be dead money. So, all that is to say that Hardy's either playing this year under the tag or we'll reach a long term deal. A trade now doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorta related.  I just looked up a stat:  Success rates for NFL draft's second rounders.  I was surprised that it is 49%.  The success rate for first rounders is 58%.   Here success does not mean those that did not bust, it means that roughly half of the players selected in the second round become full-time starters at some point in their careers.  Busts do that too.  However, considering the fact that a first round talent is worth up to 1800 points (first overall pick) more than the first pick of the second round and as low as 350 points (last pick in first round) higher than the last pick in round 2, it seems there could be cases in which it would be to your advantage to trade out of round 1 and draft two or three second rounders for the value.  Of course, the elite players are likely to be gone, and some positions overwhelmingly suck after round 1 (traditionally, like QB or LT, for example), but if you need to find starters at positions like DT, G, LB, S, C, TE, RB, etc, there could be a time when you trade back for more starters.  I was surprised that the margin between rounds 1 and 2 was only 9%.    While I realize that some of you sofa scholars are thinking, "Well duh?  Trading back gives you more players." as you wipe the Cheetos off your shirt.  Not the point.  The point is you have to consider the draft,the needs (and the number of them), and you need to scout the second and third rounds like you do the first, the cap, and the long-term impact.  If you can find 2 players with a 49% chance of becoming a starter, are you better off than drafting one player who has a 58% chance in the long term? So if I traded away my first rounder for two second rounders (a trade most teams would make) regularly, when I got 10 second rounders (by trading 5 first rounders), 5 would be starters.  If I did not trade and kept my 5 first rounders, 3 would be starters.  Furthermore, their rookie contracts would be much cheaper than the 5 first rounders. 
    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
×
×
  • Create New...