Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Godfrey Takes Large PAYCUT


jamos14

Recommended Posts

Godfrey had no chips to play.  He is coming off an Achilles injury that normally takes 2 years to recover from if you do.  Most of his idiotic salary was unguaranteed, and he had little chance of getting picked up by another team above the vet min. if cut. 

 

We got a good, experienced player for about $800K-1.5m.  If he steps up and starts, unlikely in 2014 due to the nature of the injury, we are lucky.  If not, we are not hurt.  Another move closer to being out of the pit Hurney's moronic moves put us in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just referring to the timing. We could have used that extra cap space when FA started.

 

Injured players have to be medically cleared.

 

Even so, we made free agent offers and didn't really miss out on all that much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is too aggressive at the corner position and the result has been a high amount of interference calls.

 

This stood out to me. It reminds me of all the stories about the Seahawks corners and how they had the most interference calls, but got away with a lot because the refs were hesitant to call it all game long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that my friends is Gettleman being a boss. The dude knows how to use leverage, something new to the black and blue.

 

I gotta admit, listening to Captain (and DeAngelo) the way they talk now, it's hard not to get at least a little bit of an impression that the team under Hurney was turning into a bunch of spoiled, whiny, entitled babies.

 

A culture like that would make it extremely difficult for a coach to get tough with a player when he needed to.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce hasn't done a single thing to prove he deserves to have his option picked up.  I'd have less of an issue with us declining the option and bringing him back as the starter next year than I would have us picking up that option, as that means he's on our cap books for the next 2 years instead of 1, even if he's cut before year 5. Tua threw for 3,500 yards with a 25-8 TD-INT ratio in just 13 starts the year before they picked up his option, and then threw for over 4,600 yards before they gave him his extension. Kyler threw for 3,722, 3,971, and 3,787 in 16, 16, and 14 games (while rushing for 544, 819, and 423 in those seasons) before they picked up his option and then signed him to an extension before year 4. Jones threw for 3,200 yards with a 3-1 TD-INT ratio with another 700 yards and 7 TDs rushing in year 4 before they signed him to his extension. Bryce has thrown for 2,877 and 2,400 yards in 16 and 12 starts his two seasons, while being on pace for 3,128 yards in a 17 game season so far this year. The closest comparison to any of them was Jones, who while he's turned it around this year, is someone I think everyone can agree was not a player who deserved that extension after that season. If people think those other QB's having their options picked up and/or given extensions were a mistake, in what world can you look at what Bryce has done and make any rational argument for him even being brought back as our starter next year, let alone also picking up his option that would cost us about $27 million fully guaranteed.
    • I don't think we would actually play Hooker but hopefully we also just don't see. I don't view Dalton/Bryce as a worse option than Winston/Howell. I just think we disagree on this specific subject is all.
    • I guarantee tepper would fire him if we lost out and he’d be justified 
×
×
  • Create New...