Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

Sure, if you want your eyes scratched out. Crazy women on hard drugs = more dangerous than a rabid badger named Ditka.

 

 

But they were HOLDING her.  How can she scratch anyone if they're holding her?  They're two grown-ass men.

 

And how many scratches exactly did Hardy and his partner have on them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Irv

Guest Irv

Posted
Posted

If she really was on hard drugs it would make sense for her to refuse treatment on her scratches and bruising. 

 

Bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdw Collaborator

Cdw

Posted
Posted

After listening to both those calls, unless I see some pictures of this girl and she looks like she's been beat to hell, I'm not buying it.   Sounds like they got in an argument, girl went nuts, whoever was there while Hardy was on the phone with 911 tries to restrain her, not unreasonable.   Girl that keeps interrupting the second call... well, not even the guy who called 911 buys what she is saying. 

 

However, Hardy made the decision to surround himself with people like this.  If she's doing coke I'm sure he was well aware of it.  None of this looks good for Hardy, but I don't think he beat the crap out of the girl.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

I think given the circumstances with her trying to hurt herself to make it look like he did it they wanted her there when the police arrived so they could see that she was unharmed.

 

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I read that she WASN'T there when the police arrived.

 

She was already out of the apartment.

 

So, if that is true (and somebody correct me if I'm not), then they obviously got her out of the apartment.

 

So if they got her out of the apartment, how come they needed the police to come to get her out of the apartment?

 

And if they were able to get her out of the apartment, how come they needed to "hold her down"?

 

There are still as many questions not answered on one side as the other.

 

But, yeah... crazy psycho bitch, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
  • Author
Posted

But they were HOLDING her.  How can she scratch anyone if they're holding her?  They're two grown-ass men.

 

And how many scratches exactly did Hardy and his partner have on them?

 

Here, let me give my 10 year old a bag of mike and ikes and you try to hold him down for a few minutes.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Happy Panther Grand Master

Happy Panther

Posted
Posted

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I read that she WASN'T there when the police arrived.

 

She was already out of the apartment.

 

So, if that is true (and somebody correct me if I'm not), then they obviously got her out of the apartment.

 

So if they got her out of the apartment, how come they needed the police to come to get her out of the apartment?

 

And if they were able to get her out of the apartment, how come they needed to "hold her down"?

 

There are still as many questions not answered on one side as the other.

 

But, yeah... crazy psycho bitch, of course.

1) She was obviously in the apartment when the 911 call was made.

2) The manager was apparently holding her back from attacking Hardy further

 

Hardy should file domestic battery charges against her lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

1) She was obviously in the apartment when the 911 call was made.

2) The manager was apparently holding her back from attacking Hardy further

 

Hardy should file domestic battery charges against her lol

 

 

Anyone who believes anything is "apparent' or "obvious" in this entire thing so far is easily convinced.

 

For some reason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersBigD Newbie

PanthersBigD

Posted
Posted

The girl in the neighbor call said she was there and saw it. Although, she sounded drunk and like a moron.

 

At the end, the neighbor tells the operator he has no idea what the drunk girl's name is when asked, and that it's the first time he's ever seen her and that she's obviously inebriated. He says she came down to his apartment and told him to call 911. It was probably one of Butler's friends that had gone with her. They were all drunk and making a scene.

 

And in Hardy's call, one of the first things he said was that his neighbor had seen everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • GoobyPls
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By GoobyPls · Posted

      I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • hepcat
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By hepcat · Posted

      While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
    • raleigh-panther
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By raleigh-panther · Posted

      Taylor Moton also slipped and missed his block entirely  The oline”s performance was less than stellar in the 4th qtr
×
×
  • Create New...