Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's like I said in another thread, I'll reserve judgement, but why would Hardy call 911 when it's obvious he was trying to defuse the situation? 

 

Look at this forum for example, you have the doubters and you have those condemning Hardy before all the details are out. As a child I lived with my grandparents, but my mother was abused by her boyfriend all the time and she'd come home crying that he beat her. My grandparents would tell her to call the police but she never would and the abuse continued for years until he finally killed her. When it happened I really didn't feel sadness because for one she abandoned me, but also the fact I knew she was an idiot for not leaving him.

 

I think many of us who've seen domestic abuse first hand always feel sympathy for the female as the victim, which in some cases it's 100% the truth. This has led us as a society to always view the male as the abuser and the female as a victim. It's a double standard where females could beat the living crap out of a guy with a baseball bat and he could grab her arm and leave a bruise sending him to jail.

 

Let the case progress so we can make informed decisions rather than what I've seen posted elsewhere where people pretty much would get a lynch mob together to hang him if they could.

 

What I take from the audio is that Hardy was trying to defuse the situation and called 911. The "victim" seems to know the criminal justice system quite well and was trying to get Hardy to hurt her and if that didn't work, inflict wounds on herself to make her look beaten. I would be curious to know if she has a history of mental illness, drug abuse, or any related domestic altercations in the past.

 

It's like the saying goes, you have her side, his side, and the truth is somewhere in between. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This all took place in the iveys building downtown where hardy lives. lots of uppity white people live there its entirely possible that they heard the voice of a loud black man and a white women screaming and assumed that he's beating her

 

could you just imagine the kinds of names people would be calling her if she were black?

 

lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she was going ape poo crazy and they were trying to hold her and keep her from hurting herself and themselves I can see how that would sound like a woman getting abused.

 

 

OK, they were holding her down.

 

If they were holding her that securely and what he wanted was her out of his house, how come they didn't "hold her" right out the front door?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, they were holding her down.

 

If they were holding her that securely and what he wanted was her out of his house, how come they didn't "hold her" right out the front door?

 

Sure, if you want your eyes scratched out. Crazy women on hard drugs = more dangerous than a rabid badger named Ditka.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, they were holding her down.

 

If they were holding her that securely and what he wanted was her out of his house, how come they didn't "hold her" right out the front door?

 

I think given the circumstances with her trying to hurt herself to make it look like he did it they wanted her there when the police arrived so they could see that she was unharmed.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, they were holding her down.

If they were holding her that securely and what he wanted was her out of his house, how come they didn't "hold her" right out the front door?

He kept saying please send someone. Could've wanted to hold her until the cops came to break it up and take a report. You let that woman out of your sight and she fug around and fall down the stairs, your ass is toast. Maybe he thought having his buddy Curtis hold her with minimal injuries is better than letting her go to hurt herself further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...