Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers logo, revisited: It's NOT the shape of Carolina

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

DamnItJake! Grand Master

DamnItJake!

Posted
Posted

I hate to admit this use to like Saints before the inception of the Panthers and Had the hat.. Saw them at the dome the year when they were like 6-0 and beat he niners with 15 secs left then they imploded and sucked it out ..now I miss that sucky ass team stupid Bree..

 But thank god we finally got a team I have always loved the Panthers Uniforms, colors and logo which I have to say  new logo took a while to grown on me... but it is what it is..

 

I think the Saints logo is the dumbest thing ever...because it's the Saints logo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So you are suggesting we should have the hunchback panther be our logo, cause its the shape of the Carolinas? I'd rather have the logo the shape of a panther.

I don't see a hunch in the back, but, even still, a Panther on the prowl is more likely to be parallel to the ground, or "hunchbacked" (to use your word).

Sent from my SGH-T989 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

That is extremely awesome, but we see it like once a year amongst 15 weeks of bland white.

We get the white because it is hot as fug here through 2/3 of the season.

Wearing black in those temps would be stupid.

And anyone who dues not think it makes a diff has never played organized football in the south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...