Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Damn fozzy


propagandamachine

Recommended Posts

No, but he had more than one. I'm not saying he's great, but he's better than the shitfest you put him out to be.

He has simply entered JAG territory....

Pointing that out makes some flip their poo. They then exaggerate what was said about him in their responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeAngelo contributed hugely to us winning the Jets game, the Niners game and the home Saints game.

Melvin White was a huge contributor if you nitpick out one play in a win.

RBs have to be consistant. Williams is wildly inconstant at his current age

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love DLo, he's a great guy

 

But he's a 30 year old HB with 1,300 carries. His best days are behind him. He's not as fast or agile as he used to be. He never was one to go downhill really and he definitely won't be now.

 

If he plays great, good! So be it. I want him to prove me wrong. But he hasn't been. And he'll never have a 08 season again. Or close to it. We're paying a lot of money rn for a sub-par HB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone contain your boners and remember that Deangelo Williams is still a good running back.

 

No, Deangelo was good in 2008-2009, and afterward he's just been mediocre.  With the line the way it is this year, he might be straight up bad.  If it weren't for his contract he might have been gone a few seasons ago.  #thxhurney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was also the reason we lost the Seattle game.

I didn't know football was an individual sport. Guess the other 10 people on the field could just walk off and leave all the blame for D Will. What about our defense allowing Seattle to score more than we did. Guess that's Williams' fault too.

----------------

Cam for MVP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...