Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Happy's Final model vs Pete Prisco - how the NFL pans out


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

I'm testing the theory that I can make the equivalent of computer monkeys do as well as the so called experts. I can't find Peter King's yet and if anyone has his final standings please post it. Prisco actually has some teams moving around which is more realistic. Prisco is getting to the point that people tend to not move teams around much and assume every game is going to be like 21-14.

 

My final standings. The Carolina result is mostly pure random variance not me manipulating the model.

 

2a7vkba.png

 

Pete Prisco's

vqto8w.png

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/pete-prisco/24683167/predicting-every-nfl-game-heres-how-the-season-plays-out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Carolina Game by game. the model is not supposed to predict individual scores but I am listing what popped out for fun.

 

While the streaks are crazy the defense looks realistic rarely giving up more than 20. The model must think KB is going to have some big games.

 

Stranger things have happened.

 

2chuwy9.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems a little unrealistic that all the NFC West teams are that bad outside of SF, who actually will likely be worse than 11-5. Also, that the Saints go 6-10, Green Bay 7-9 and New England 7-9 -- not happening, 3 of the 4 best QBs' teams won't be that bad. Houston will be better than 1-15, rarely does a team have the #1 pick two years in a row. I do believe we could go 13-3 (that's around our ceiling if our line can surprise people) but some of the rest seems a little ridiculous. I really hope I'm wrong and you're right because I love the way your standings have it other than the Whiners making the playoffs, but I just can't say that it's realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7-9 wins is all i see. if we had one better guy at OL or wr, i might push it to 10-11 wins.

 

this is a very tough schedule. we absolutely have to go steal a win at TB for the opener. having the Lions and Steelers at home helps but they will be tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7-9 wins is all i see. if we had one better guy at OL or wr, i might push it to 10-11 wins.

this is a very tough schedule. we absolutely have to go steal a win at TB for the opener. having the Lions and Steelers at home helps but they will be tough.

Last year mentality.

Let.

It.

Go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year mentality.

Let.

It.

Go.

 

Nothing to let go off. An eyeball hunch from what i see on the field and the moves that were made/not made. I didn't expect 12-4 but I did expect 10-6.

I have no problem being wrong about this.

 

Add to the fact the NFC south ferris wheel and it's a natural call.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing to let go off. An eyeball hunch from what i see on the field and the moves that were made/not made. I didn't expect 12-4 but I did expect 10-6.

I have no problem being wrong about this.

Add to the fact the NFC south ferris wheel and it's a natural call.

I'm just pumped for the season opener. Thinking positively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it'd be interesting to add up the "experts" (lulz) predictions and cross reference it to schedule to see if it's even mathematically accurate.

I think they just poo out a record without even bothering to check sometimes. Like having two teams that play each other both going 16-0 for instance. Not that anyone has ever predicted that of course, but just used it to try and relay the point I'm making.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how folks say our schedule is easy or tough.  Truth is that most every game comes down to 4 or 5 plays that one team executes and the other does not. For example winning on the road is very tough in the NFL no matter who you play.  As for this week, this game will be very tough being their first game under Lovie and he and the team want to show how much they have improved and change the losing culture in Tampa.

On the other hand this is not a make or break game for us at this point.  With Cam hurt, our receivers and O line not yet gelling, this will be a cat fight.  We need things on special teams to go right and for the defense to come out of the blocks firing on all cylinders for us to have a good chance to win.  We have to do a much better job against their receivers than we did last year where they just threw it up and let their tall receivers jump over the Captain for example.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...