Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Should We As Panthers Fans Respond To Domestic Violence?


KendrickPanther

Recommended Posts

It's already well documented that the Observer thinks Hardy should be released and we as fans should turn our back on him. To me ostracizing Hardy is not the answer. Turning our back on our players is a negative message and the wrong message. Hardy hasn't even had his due process yet.

 

However the bigger issue to me right now is how the NFL has handled this Ray Rice situation. I think every NFL fan base should respond with a positive message. During the National Anthem I think it would be cool if every couple in every stadium held hands and raised them to the sky. Families could do it to. It tells the NFL how we feel about the people we love and it tells the rest of the country how we feel as well. It's a positive gesture that inspires people to be better partners without shunning those who are trying to improve themselves.

 

How do you feel we should respond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth? Many couples will hold hands and go home and beat on each other. We need to stop treating this like it's a disease like Cancer that we can just come together and fight.

There is a huge difference in a couple fighting and her man striking her and a woman getting beat by a drunken husband every night. If Chris Brown is still allowed on the radio, then Ray Rice should be allowed to serve his suspension and return. This is such an individual issue, we can't control what happens between two individuals in love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth? Many couples will hold hands and go home and beat on each other. We need to stop treating this like it's a disease like Cancer that we can just come together and fight.

 

uh, we can come together and fight it. much like other behavior that society collectively deems harmful and unacceptable, we can stigmatize it and define it as aberrant behavior that has zero place in civilized society.

 

actions are shaped by ideology, and ideology is formed by people collectively deciding upon it, so if dialogues produced by this event cause people to decide against it en masse, then people by definition have "come together and fought" against it and seen a shift on the rudder of social progression away from domestic violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the National Anthem I'd prefer to keep my right hand over my heart as the traditionally recognized symbolic gesture of patriotism to our country.  You could wear a ribbon or a screen printed t-shirt with a ghostbusters symbol over Ray Rice's face.  Something more pragmatic would be not to hit your significant other in grill when he/she/whatever pisses you off, drag he/she/whatever down a hallway, and then look at your watch.  I get what you're saying and I am against busting your lady up side the head but when I am drinking my beer and eating my hotdog at the game I don't want the constant reminder.  I get enough of that on CNN, FOXSports, FOXNews, MSNBC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNW, ESPN Deportes, ESPN3, ESPN Classics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of a silly question. Most of us don't hit women. Striking women is wrong under most circumstances. The only time a man should physically harm a woman is if he is in danger of serious harm from her. Otherwise, it's inexcusable in my opinion. Opinion.

 

Opinion.

 

Need I say it again.

 

Opinion.

 

Stop arguing over opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth? Many couples will hold hands and go home and beat on each other. We need to stop treating this like it's a disease like Cancer that we can just come together and fight.

There is a huge difference in a couple fighting and her man striking her and a woman getting beat by a drunken husband every night. If Chris Brown is still allowed on the radio, then Ray Rice should be allowed to serve his suspension and return. This is such an individual issue, we can't control what happens between two individuals in love.

Have you stopped beating your wife?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure Greg's situation should be classed as domestic violence. Okay, let's talk like folks who have had some experience in life for a moment. Doing physical bodily harm, intentionally, to your significant other, whether wife, husband, girlfriend or boyfriend, I think, should constitute domestic violence. If the relationship is of the more freaky variety, which some of you may have experienced, where the main reason for being is/has been sex, drugs, or just a strange good time, where the thought of permanent union was never even considered, where is the "domestic" in that? That is the main question which bothers me. If you include this group of participants, then even a bad experience with a 'call Girl" should be termed "domestic violence if any kind of aggressive physical altercation happens. Now the fact that dealing with call girls or prostitutes is immoral by most religious standards, to me it seems we are heading down a slippery slope when we apply casual sexual partners under the umbrella of domestic violence. There should be some other category to place it under and it, for other good reasons, should be prosecuted for what it is. NOT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, which carries the stipulation that it must be prosecuted even without the victims desire to have it prosecuted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rams since you beat them already and they are 0-2 on the road against NFC South teams.
    • Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
×
×
  • Create New...