Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

shula is a symptom, not the disease


Fiz

Recommended Posts

alright im drinking by myself because im in asheville and i don't know anyone so here are some words

 

the panthers really don't have any talent on the offensive line, and their running backs are all dead. yet for the past two games they've tried ineffectively to establish the run. Their QB is no real threat to run the ball (RPG down from 7 to 2 this year) and defenses aren't even biting on the read option anymore. 

 

This doesn't mean they can't run the ball. There are other ways to to pick up yards on the ground, namely stretching out the defense and getting them out of the base alignments. For those that have no idea what that means, when you put more wide receivers on the field, defenses will likely take out fat dudes and put in more skinny fast dudes. Theoretically, the fewer fat dudes you have, the better your chances are of blocking successfully, especially since your fat dudes have the benefit of knowing what's going to happen. 

 

Obviously the Panthers haven't done this this year. Even down three scores against the ravens on sunday, the Panthers were running primarily out of base sets: 1-2 TE, 2 WR, FB, RB, etc. This is like 1970s football and its very easy to gameplan against. Take out the read option and this is the most simple offense in the world to guard against, especially when you physically don't have the players to run it. Run blocking is theoretically easier than pass blocking, since all your fat dudes are doing is running real hard and hitting someone. No one told our fat dudes this. 

 

so yeah i think the injuries and lack of talent are revealing the flaws in this playcalling, and I don't think shula or rivera are capable or willing to deviate from the script, which means, uh, not good things. 

 

but to my point, the blame has been far reaching. Shula is the obvious candidate and obviously he's an untalented hack who only has a job because of his last name. I've never been a fan of ron rivera, i thought last year was an anomaly, and i thought his "riverboat" nickname was misplaced. I argued this point extensively and boy howdy do i look correct right now. Gettleman's name gets dragged through the mud, but I don't really think that's fair. He's working with zero cap space, cleaning up hurney's mess, and you can't fix every problem at once. He's put a great set of WRs out there, more than made up for smith's departure IMO (even though it was handled terribly) and done what he can with his back against the wall. I would have preferred he drafted 7 pro bowlers too but what can you reasonably expect?

 

The real problem is jerry.

 

i've been following this team since sweating my chubby 9 year old ass off in clemson and every single year they've been the same. they're gonna run the ball, establish the run, and play suffocating defense. This is what you'd expect an owner to want who played football in the blood and guts era, or back when defenses could actually play defense. The problem with this constant striving for a very specific, antiquated form of football is it hasn't been very successful. The Panthers have had a whopping 5 winning seasons in their two decades of existence. With the exception of one year when the defense just couldn't stop anyone (glorious 1998) and arguably the 2003 playoff run when Jake Delhomme reached his final form, they've prided themselves on being a running team that tries to stop the run. It hasn't worked. 

 

4 former DC head coaches, 4 ish GMs, no sustained success, and no real hopes for the future. Even when Chud was brought in to run his ZANY OFFENSE, it was still predicated on running, just with a QB. Now Shula is running his dad's playbook. True, around this time last year, everything started coming together, but I just don't see it. The dline is a shambles, the plug in play safeties aren't nearly as good as last year's batch, and we don't have the coaching to overcome offensive line inadequacies. 

 

But hey, every five years or so it all comes together, right? 

 

Problem won't change until Jerry is dead. Sorry if that's morbid. 

 

But Jerry could see the error in his ways. There's a solution, and it's just like 6 hours down the road....

 

keep-calm-and-get-on-the-gus-bus.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Riddle me this Fizzy... What has changed with the D from games 1&2 to games 3&4?

It's not Hardy and it's not TD.

It's something on the D kind but idk what?

Obviously the Bucs are terrible, and the Lions didn't have a good gameplan against the Panthers. 

 

Against the Steelers, the Panthers actually didn't play that bad on defense. The offense couldn't get going and eventually the the defense just wore down. There were two hideous mental errors (the offsides on the FG and the Punt Return) that started the snow ball rolling. Points beget points. And Ben made 1 or 2 just incredible throws. The quick flip to the back of the end zone? What can you do?

 

Davis was obviously out against the Ravens, and he can't be replaced. But the Ravens have a baller as fug offensive line, even without their LT. I know we like to scream doom and gloom, but the other guys practice too and they would have been up for it even if the Panthers DLine was at full strength. They were able to take Kuechly out, then it was just the random untalented assholes in the secondary to stop anyone, and they couldn't. Also, again, Flacco made every fuging throw. That corner endzone touchdown was unguardable. Sometimes you get beat. 

 

There was also some horseshit. Smith's first TD would have been an interception if he hadn't been there. Luke "dropped" a pick six.

 

Last year the Panthers had every bounce go there way, for the past two weeks they lost every bounce, and fuged up at some really inopportune times. 

 

We'll see. I don't expect a win against the bears though. They're the kings of horseshit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Riddle me this Fizzy... What has changed with the D from games 1&2 to games 3&4?

It's not Hardy and it's not TD.

It's something on the D line but idk what?

 

I think the answer to that riddle is Hardy. I know he wasn't there for week two but after the Lions game, teams had tape on what our line looked like and what we did without Hardy. They were able to adjust... at least that's my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think part of the answer is Hardy, but only like 15%. Fiz has a great point about Keek and most especially about "breaks". We did catch a LOT of breaks last season. We caught none the past two games.

If our Dline doesnt figure some shiz out and quick, Keek could literally be Superman and we'd still get killed.

As for the main point of the OP, the offense is just a clusterfug mainly bc of the line. Hurt RBs are part of the price of doing business. The WRs have def exceeded expectations. Cam is hurt and behind that Oline Barry fuging Sanders would struggle.

It's all on the D to hold opponents to like 10 points or we have serious issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...