Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 2 defenses from last year ...


Udogg

Recommended Posts

Luke Kuechly will not be getting any votes for Defensive MVP this season.

No more Sunday Night intro videos with Carrie Underwood either.

MVP, OPOY, and DPOY all essentially require playing on a good team. We aren't a good team. Not even close to it. Luke is still going to put up gaudy personal stats, but we aren't going to have any players in consideration for personal awards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only tackles in the backfield(like sacks) should count. Those falling on the pile after 1st down conversions are nonsense.

This is idiotic.

Tackles in the backfield do count differently, they're tackles for loss. Sacks do count differently, they're sacks. Tackles absolutely should count and absolutely matter. If no tackle occurred virtually every play would go for a TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good OL is the most critical group to successful football.   If your OL can run block and pass block, you keep your offense on the field and the opposing offense off the field.  You win TOP and tire the defense.

 

BUT, if you have one or two defensive linemen who can consistently win their space and blow up the opposing OL, you've got something really powerful in just a couple of players.  Hardy is one of those guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, and if I don't breathe I will die. Tackles are necessary part of the game. If tackles count, running should count as well. I'm not talking running with the football just running. I want to know who runs the most every time the ball snaps. Running is as necessary as tackles.

This is actually tracked in soccer.

Sorry to bust your idiot stat tracking bubble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...