Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Boston should be starting over Harper.

 

 

"watching harper tackle is like streaming 1080p hd on 3mbps internet connection... one second it looks like it will work, then it freezes, then the video jumps ahead and the player is out of sync, it then clears up to see the td celebration. smh"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He came in at the very end for like 5 plays or so. He made one tackle but the play was called back for holding. I think we need to let him get some time at SS, as roman is sucking.

roman has 3 intos just picture how much boston would have , bostons way better, I thought harper was gunna play agressive like mitchell did but I was wrong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to insert these young dudes. Norman too.

But we also need to get away from the 2013 blueprint and realize all it does is get us beat. We need to gamble and blitz. Try to help the secondary out. Yes, blitzing puts more on their shoulders but if we get their it gives them a chance to make plays. The 2013 model just leaves them hanging anyway to get torched

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to insert these young dudes. Norman too.

But we also need to get away from the 2013 blueprint and realize all it does is get us beat. We need to gamble and blitz. Try to help the secondary out. Yes, blitzing puts more on their shoulders but if we get their it gives them a chance to make plays. The 2013 model just leaves them hanging anyway to get torched

 

I can't agree more with this.

 

The line isn't a strength this year. We're not going to generate consistent pressure with a standard rush. We're already getting waxed by double digits and allowing NBA style points per game. Mix it up and blitz a lot more, throw out some of the younger guys and try to inject some speed. What's the worst that can happen? We allow 35+ and lose by 20?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to insert these young dudes. Norman too.

But we also need to get away from the 2013 blueprint and realize all it does is get us beat. We need to gamble and blitz. Try to help the secondary out. Yes, blitzing puts more on their shoulders but if we get their it gives them a chance to make plays. The 2013 model just leaves them hanging anyway to get torched

 

 

I agree! The pass rush is nowhere like it was last season so we need to adjust. I am very disappointed in our safety play. Harper is just too slow. I wouldn't mind those positions to be shaken up. I am not sure how good Tre Boston is but at this point, I'm ready to see a change back there. Also with Godfrey, he is just not suited as a cornerback. He doesn't have that quickness that is needed. Honestly, put him back at safety or something. Anyway, what do I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...