Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Seattle Seahawks’ Big Problem


LUUUUUKE

Recommended Posts

I found this very well put together article about the Seahawks during my nightly sports reading. It details what's wrong with their Defense. In a nutshell, they're not as deep on the D-line as they were last year due to FA departures. I found it interesting, as we too are having issues on our D line although not the same, I believe it definitely draws a parallel between two of last year's most dominant Defenses, and why they're not the same this year.

I highly recommend a full read on this one after a sampling of this excerpt

The numbers are staggering. Last season, the Seahawks sacked the quarterback 12 times in the fourth quarter. This season, they are on pace to do it twice. They have allowed 8 yards per passing attempt in the fourth quarter—up 40% from last season. Most astonishing is the difference in quarterback “hurries,” or rushed passing attempts, late in games: Last season, the Seahawks hurried the opposing quarterback 21 times in the fourth quarter. This season’s total: one.

Bennett, one of the linemen that the Seahawks did hold on to, has played over 70% of Seattle’s defensive snaps in all six games this season, according to Pro Football Focus. Last year, over the entire 16-game season, he played that much only four times. Cliff Avril has played over 60% in five of Seattle’s six games. Last year, all season, he did that twice.

It definitely shows their weakness. Unfortunately for us, our O line sucks. We'll see how it plays out between the lines on Sunday. I'm looking forward to it. Pretty good read though right?

http://m.wsj.com/articles/the-seattle-seahawks-big-problem-1413909012?mobile=y&ru=yahoo?mod=yahoo_itp

I also wish somebody cared enough about us to write some in depth analysis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of us are pointing to Hardy's absence on the DL, but don't forget that Frank Alexander is also missing from the rotation. Who knows what the problem is, but we also had a very nice/deep rotation on the DL as a whole last year. Doesn't look to be the case this year. This article has made me think a little bit. Although we're not Seattle we had a lot in common with them last year as far as our front 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Seattle now. All my friends are Seahawks fans (don't know why). Anyway the local sports radio has been talking about this very issue. However I have not heard anyone think the Seahawks will lose or that the game will even be close. I so hope the Panthers can take the Hawks down this weekend!! It will make my party GREAT!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Seattle now. All my friends are Seahawks fans (don't know why). Anyway the local sports radio has been talking about this very issue. However I have not heard anyone think the Seahawks will lose or that the game will even be close. I so hope the Panthers can take the Hawks down this weekend!! It will make my party GREAT!!

I really dont get why people seem to think the Seahawks will easily beat us. They lost to the Rams, say what you will about us but everyone of our losses has been to legit teams. Them losing to the Rams is equal to us losing to the Bucs.

Our receiving threats are head and shoulders above theirs, I think Cam is slightly better than Wilson and both our Ds suck. This will be their 2nd consecutive east coast road game. Can someone please tell me how the Seahawks are better than us by such a huge margin as people claim other than "but bu they are the super bowl champz" because both of us are 3-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Seattle now. All my friends are Seahawks fans (don't know why). Anyway the local sports radio has been talking about this very issue. However I have not heard anyone think the Seahawks will lose or that the game will even be close. I so hope the Panthers can take the Hawks down this weekend!! It will make my party GREAT!!

 

This is what Gil Brandt wrote today;

 

 

Seattle should pull even with 4-3 San Francisco (which has a bye in Week 8) after beating the Carolina Panthers this coming Sunday -- but ultimately, I think the Seahawks are more likely to fall short at season's end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can think we're going to lose all they want, it doesn't mean it's gonna happen. I was really hoping that the article would have stirred up some comparisons between our line last year to what it is this year. I guess that's asking too much 'round these parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really dont get why people seem to think the Seahawks will easily beat us. They lost to the Rams, say what you will about us but everyone of our losses has been to legit teams. Them losing to the Rams is equal to us losing to the Bucs.

Our receiving threats are head and shoulders above theirs, I think Cam is slightly better than Wilson and both our Ds suck. This will be their 2nd consecutive east coast road game. Can someone please tell me how the Seahawks are better than us by such a huge margin as people claim other than "but bu they are the super bowl champz" because both of us are 3-3

 

False. Their defense is still ranked top 10 while our D is ranked near last. I have a really bad feeling about this game, especially with the way our defense has been looking. I just hope we contain Wilson because our D-line has had a bad habit this year of rushing too much downfield and losing contain (see Cutler, Rodgers, and even Dalton). If we do that against Wilson, he is going to run all over us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody talks about Seattle's "leagon of boom" or whatever it is, but during the offseason they lost 3 d lineman.  2 DT and a DE I think.  While none of the guys were great pass rushers all of them contributed into the rotation and were solid.  Now they just don't have the depth on the line.  They don't have the guys to rotate in anymore.  So everyone say all you want about the secondary sucking, even Seattle with its "great" secondary cant stop teams from passing.  The biggest difference in the 2014 Panthers and the 2013 is Greg Hardy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quoted rom one of the many Bryce threads... Wanted to reply to this, but since my answer turned into a go route (i.e. went long) I thought I'd put it in a separate thread. So here's my take on the names mentioned above (and others) ... Lance was a prototypical "take an athlete and teach him to play quarterback" example who now serves as an example of why that's a bad idea. Worth remembering that Lance was given to a coach heralded as a QB guru with a friendly system. In the end though, even that potentially ideal situation wasn't enough. And the fact those events were followed up by said guru taking his team to the Super Bowl with a QB who went undrafted helps bolster the folly.of that approach. But then you have Wilson, an actual quarterback with off the charts passing skill. This guy's sure to succeed, right? Well...wrong, which demonstrates that even the right skill set doesn't guarantee success.  Could Wilson have succeeded in a better situation under better coaching? Unknown, but it's a question I find myself asking a lot. (See also: Levis, Will) Rosen falls into the Ryan Leaf / Ryan Mallet category, i.e. don't hand the keys to your billion dollar franchise over to a dickhead. Character matters, and not strictly in the 'upright citizen vs thuggish criminal ' way. (I could add maybe don't draft guys with the first name 'Ryan' unless they went to Harvard, and even then only in the 7th round) Darnold is another guy who likely could have benefited from a better situation / coaching (see also Carr: David). Heck, it also might have helped to send him to The Wizard and have him ask for "da noiv", or perhaps to Egon Spengler and company to chase away any and all "ghosts". Sending him to Matt Rhule? 😬 Yeah...definitely not the answer 😕 But hey, at least he's doing better now. (ttill playoff time, anyway) Mind you, Drew Brees does serve as proof that guys who land in less than ideal - or just flat out lousy - situations early on can indeed resurrect their careers later on in better surroundings. Will Darnold go that far? Unknown, but we do know it's possible. Kenny Pickett (also known by the X-Men moniker 'Littlehand') is that proverbial great college quarterback who for one reason or another just doesn't cut it in the pros.  (gotta say, feels like the past several drafts have put forth a lot of that particular QB archetype) Mac Jones could arguably carry this label as well, though I'm waiting to see how things play out in San Francisco. For now, Jones might be a better example of why you should always be cautious and skeptical of guys from certain systems. Justin Fields is a cell in that spreadsheet column, as is Kyler Murray. Now I'm sure someone here will mention another certain quarterback we're all quite familiar with as a prime example of this subset too 😐 Fair point, though I think he, Murray and Tagovailoa work better under the heading of "Davids". What's a David? It's a guy you send to battle against a "Goliath". And by all means, bet on that guy if he's a shepherd.  If he's a quarterback, though? 🤔 Root for him, encourage him, appreciate his courage and be inspired by him... ...but don't draft him. The return on investment might be a great story, but it's not likely to be one that involves championships and rings. ... Bottom Line? You've no doubt heard this saying "this ain't rocket science".  Well, I'd argue saying "this ain't quarterback evaluation" might truly make a better negative metaphorical comparison. At least with rocket science, it's science. You're working with things that have some level of consistency, even predictability. Stuff like chemistry, physics, metallurgy, etc. Human beings?  Specifically young male athletes with massive amounts of ego and testosterone who've been heavily catered to a lot of their lives and have now been handed large sums money and a portal to fame... Yeah, good luck with thatb😖 Heck, you might get better odds buying a Powerball ticket, or perhaps playing a roulette wheel at a Vegas casino. (gambling involves risk; please play responsibility. for help with gambling addiction call the Gambling Hotline at 1-800-522-4700)
    • The sad part is Williams led the league in rushing tds as well with like 18 and didn't even make the pro bowl that season.  Too bad it all ended in Jake's epic collapse 
    • Yeah. He talked about using him that way and I forget the term. Maybe nickel LB? Ike have to watch it again.    If you look at the video it is maybe 2/3 through where talks about him and also CSW.     
×
×
  • Create New...