Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Godfrey Question for the Cap Experts


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

how much does his release cost the team in dead money / cap space? how does this affect us for the coming offseason? im not terribly familiar with cap calculations. i can compare figures after they've been calculated but the calculation still gets me

 

Add to his question does it save anything this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would have counted for $4.1m in salary next year, $3m in dead money. So we net out and gain $1.1m in cap space for next year, I believe.

You aren't really gaining anything because you don't have him and have to replace him with someone else.  Just like we aren't gaining 13 million by not resigning Hardy, we are simply redistributing his money on other guys.  Yeah it might seem like semantics but it is a pet peeve of mine like when my wife says she saved me 200 hundred dollars but buying something on sale and only spending 300 dollars.  She didn't save me anything she just spent 300 hundred instead of 500 bucks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cap hit is about $2.1m this year, $3m next, then he's off the books. In other words we only saved about $1m this year but about $4.1m next.

He was also due another $6.4m in 2016, but that's now off the books.

There's no dead money for him next year so he's actually off the books after this season with dead money totaling 2.9 million
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would have counted for $4.1m in salary next year, $3m in dead money. So we net out and gain $1.1m in cap space for next year, I believe.

Doesn't really work like that. His cap number for next year before being cut was 7.1m. His new cap number is 3m for next year. We will gain around 4 million in cap space.

You aren't really gaining anything because you don't have him and have to replace him with someone else. Just like we aren't gaining 13 million by not resigning Hardy, we are simply redistributing his money on other guys. Yeah it might seem like semantics but it is a pet peeve of mine like when my wife says she saved me 200 hundred dollars but buying something on sale and only spending 300 dollars. She didn't save me anything she just spent 300 hundred instead of 500 bucks.

I would call 4 million gaining something. That is if you think we can replace his production for that amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't really work like that. His cap number for next year before being cut was 7.1m. His new cap number is 3m for next year. We will gain around 4 million in cap space.

I would call 4 million gaining something. That is if you think we can replace his production for that amount.

Maybe the term "freeing up" would work for everyone. I personally like the word gain though as we now have cap space to utilize that we didn't before.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...