Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Greg Olsen is our number one WR." Yeah. That was a problem vs Packers.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

If yesterday doesn't show you why we need another legit playmaker at WR, I just don't know what will.

 

First off, Olsen is not a WR, much less our WR1.  He is a good TE---a top 5 TE---in this league who was pretty easily neutralized by a good defense.  Oh, wondering what happened to Olsen yesterday?  Rivera basically said that the Seahawks purposefully took Olsen out of the game with some "things" they were doing.  Anyway...for whatever reason, our other WRs or TEs could not make up for Olsen virtually being put on ice.  Blame the play calling or improper usage of personnel if you like, but Olsen's nullification just speaks to our need---in the worst kind of way---for another legitimate play maker at WR, whether a 1 or a 2 or somewhere in between. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB is a #1 WR. Do we need someone opposite him with some speed and playmaking ability? Yes. But our problem vs the Seahawks was retarded play calling and no o-line, not the WRs. Greg Olsen wasn't shutdown by the Seahawks. He was shutdown by Mike Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB is a #1 WR. Do we need someone opposite him with some speed and playmaking ability? Yes. But our problem vs the Seahawks was retarded play calling and no o-line, not the WRs. Greg Olsen wasn't shutdown by the Seahawks. He was shutdown by Mike Shula.

 

That's not what our defensive specialist and coach said.  It really makes sense too (if you think about it).  Why would Shula use Olsen all season long and then just not use him vs the 'Hawks?  Doesn't make sense if you think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. Our top 2 WRs last year are having 1000 yard seasons in other systems. Lack of weapons isnt the problem, it's not knowing how to use them that is.

 

I hear what you're saying, but it's not quite that simple.  They are surrounded by better personnel which makes it easier for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not what our defensive specialist and coach said.  It really makes sense too (if you think about it).  Why would Shula use Olsen all season long and then just not use him vs the 'Hawks?  Doesn't make sense if you think about it.

 

Go back and watch the film. Olsen was blocking on most of his snaps and when he wasn't he was mostly open. In the redzone they put an extra safety on him so they shut him down then but in the middle of the field he wasn't shutdown and still saw only 2 looks. When he did run a route it was nothing special to get him open and Cam likely didn't see him, but he didn't run many routes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could have won that game with what we have for weapons. Yes I'd love to have a WR with some world class speed. But KB is good enough to make things happen. We need throw him the ball 10 times a game. For the sake of the game plan I feel like thats why we don't. But the he's the kind of playmaker to make up for the deficiencies we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could have won that game with what we have for weapons. Yes I'd love to have a WR with some world class speed. But KB is good enough to make things happen. We need throw him the ball 10 times a game. For the sake of the game plan I feel like thats why we don't. But the kind of playmaker to make up for the deficiencies we have.

 

With all due respect, damn "could have won...with what we have," we have been looking at a broken-winged passing offense for the better part of a decade.  It has been so obvious that it is downright nauseating.  To me it is especially nauseating after some we passed up in this year's draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a #1 WR that can consistently catch. My biggest hangup on Benji in the offseason was the droppsies. He hasn't done anything to prove me wrong... Too many mental /concentration drops. That has nothing to do with being a rookie. 

 

He's still a monster, I'm just starting to get annoyed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...