Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm pretty sure everyone saw this coming


davos

Recommended Posts

For TL,DR go to EVERYONE in caps.

 

This is something I'm curious about hearing from you guys:   

 

Last season: The majority of fans and local writers all recognized Bell as a bad RT and wanted him benched.  There was also converted TE to DT to OG that filled in somewhat below average at RG/RT.  We also had Williams as a below average vet backup. 

 

Offseason: Gross retires.  Everyone is curious about what tackles we'll bring in.  The majority of fans, national media, and local outlets all recognize we didn't have talent there.  The staff then hints that Bell could get a look at LT even before the draft and FA moves.  We all kinda disregarded it.    

 

Draft: Not a single OT taken.  Now I completely understand the BPA strategy but don't think it's the right way to go.  Team's have cap space being taken up at certain positions and of course positions of need that give prioritization to drafting certain players.  What I find troubling is grabbing whoever is #1 on your board with NO deliberation (we're the only team that gives no more than 15 seconds to pick 2 years running now; I just find this odd..anyone else?).  Decent haul in the draft but the positions relative to the picks baffled A LOT of people.      

 

FA:  There are like 40+ OTs available.  We grab NONE but did scoop up a Canadian as an UDFA.  Overall, we pretty much grab cheap vets with liability issues rather than the young underachievers with potential route.  I would say Dickson and Webb were the only exceptions.  Underwood was on the fringe in this regard.    

 

TC: everyone kept waiting for a OT signing but after the hearing about a failed attempt at one guy in Anthony Collins, we settled for what we had.  What I'm getting at:

 

--

 

EVERYONE saw there was a major issue on the line.  Seriously, everyone was taken back by our offseason until training camp when we put fan-goggles on.  You'd think the OL should have the most priority given the current NFL landscape (even more so than the DL).  

 

I understand they had "faith" in guys as a staff but it was blatantly obvious we had nothing at the position.  That's what grinds my gears.  They moved the RT everyone wanted benched to starting LT and the DT converted RG fill-in to RT.   There has to be some line of approval from the Scouts to Brown to Matsko to Rivera to DG and those guys completely muffed in the draft, FA, everything.  

 

Even if we finish 10-5-1 I'm done with the coaching staff and DG better prove he can assemble a competent team this offseason.  He will have plenty to work with.  There's no doubt Ron and Dave work together to an extent for what players should be brought in and they're both responsible.  The amount of misses was ridiculous this offseason.  

 

All of the things that gave us a terrible taste in our mouth this offseason are proving to be what we originally expected before the training camp blinders turned on.  We've been reminded twice of this on national TV and it's honestly embarrassing for the organization so I hope they recognize it.   

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the Bell move because at least he has played NFL tackle. Chandler had not. Foucalt had not. Garry Williams had a little experience but he did his usual thing (get hurt in the first week). 

 

But there is still something no one wants to consider. There are a dozen teams starting crap tackles. All of their fan bases are as irate as us. The only difference is ours are making less money. We competed with those teams for tackles and ultimately they paid a higher price for the same return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I think Gettleman was given enough rope last season to hang himself this season. When he preaches that the trenches is the way to build the team, and then completely disregard the offensive line because Gettleman's dick gets hard when he sees a sack... Well, that put us in this situation.

And it's not just the past offseason. Even as fans, we all knew that Gross was nearing retirement before last season. We knew that Garry Williams couldn't stay healthy. We knew that Bell sucked, just by watching the games every week. If we notice these things, as fans, how the fug did Gettleman not notice? Was there a sale on Bermuda shorts that distracted him?

Also, the "bigger = better" theory is nice, but there needs to be speed to compliment it. Even the Seahawks, the team that lives and dies by that motto, has already began sprinkling their offense with speedy guys to get a beat on the big, lumbering corners.

The NFL is ever changing. Always different. I think that Gettleman still believes that this is the Giants' super bowl years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i refuse to believe that DG was so cocky that he thought bell and chandler were the answers. nobody looking at both of them could actually think this was the answer. there might have been some form of hope like most of us here before the season said. but somebody with DG's pedigree for talent evaluating could not sit there and think that. I think he thought Cam could continue to mask deficiencies on O while still having a dominant defense would win us games.

 

i think he just thought in the short term tagging hardy would keep this front seven (the obvious strength of the team) intact and would give us a good chance to be competitive again over anything else without sacrificing long term goals. this backfired obviously. and this is what we have.

 

i think the question should be should we have gone OL instead of Kelvin in the first round. Should we have spent a good chunk of our cap on a marginal tackle this year. I don't know anymore.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always thought the BPA is for lazy losers.

 

I mean you'd think there should be an understanding of what makes sense given what's on the team.  That's why I assume a lot of teams deliberate for a bit in their war rooms.  Seeing who really fits best and makes the most sense.  Dave has a list and it seems whoever is available at the top of it is getting chosen, no ifs, ands, or buts.  Maybe he gets a thumb up from Rivera too haha.  

 

The BPA should have a healthy consideration of a team's needs and I think strictly BPA can hurt more than it helps.  I won't disregard that DG has spotted decent talent in some rounds for us but just really dislike the overall strategy this offseason given we have a young yet vulnerable star at QB who already had to carry the team on his back.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really this team was living and dying on the decisions of Fox and Hurney the past few years, Stew, Dwill, Gross, LaFell, Smith, Hardy, Johnson, Davis etc. (I think it was Hurney who brought in Olsen too) Now you see all the previous regime guys leaving, getting cut, getting injured and now all you see is the bums Gettleman has brought in (Cotchery, Avant, Harper, Ealy, etc)

 

To be fair the books are screwed up heavily. Hopefully if we ever get in a good position financially we can see what Gettleman can put together. 13 million for Hardy looks really stupid though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i refuse to believe that DG was so cocky that he thought bell and chandler were the answers. nobody looking at both of them could actually think this was the answer. there might have been some form of hope like most of us here before the season said. but somebody with DG's pedigree for talent evaluating could not sit there and think that. I think he thought Cam could continue to mask deficiencies on O while still having a dominant defense would win us games.

 

i think he just thought in the short term tagging hardy would keep this front seven (the obvious strength of the team) intact and would give us a good chance to be competitive again over anything else without sacrificing long term goals. this backfired obviously. and this is what we have.

 

i think the question should be should we have gone OL instead of Kelvin in the first round. Should we have spent a good chunk of our cap on a marginal tackle this year. I don't know anymore.

 

It was interesting in the draft.  A lot of tackles that were deemed to be mid to late rounders in the build-up were found out to be highly sought after and have looked good to great.  I'm speaking to James, Britt, and Bitonio (T/G *stud this year at LG).  All went before our 2nd/3rd pick.  The top ones had the adverse effect minus Lewan.  I'm just curious to where some of those guys were on our board.  Also, a good amount of the late rounders made active rosters.  

 

I actually agreed with the Hardy tag if he wanted around or more than the tag amount.  So, we have to live with that unfortunately but even with a dominant DL, you have to give the guy trying to carry the franchise on his back some help or at least depth at offensive tackle.  

 

I remember during the Fox era, people here preached a lot how LT was arguably the most important position on a team and ever since Gross retired, I haven't heard that much.  For the sake of DG's credibility, I really hope that we considered an FA OT other than Anthony Collins.  I don't remember any others we brought in to interview.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really this team was living and dying on the decisions of Fox and Hurney the past few years, Stew, Dwill, Gross, LaFell, Smith, Hardy, Johnson, Davis etc. (I think it was Hurney who brought in Olsen too) Now you see all the previous regime guys leaving, getting cut, getting injured and now all you see is the bums Gettleman has brought in (Cotchery, Avant, Harper, Ealy, etc)

 

To be fair the books are screwed up heavily. Hopefully if we ever get in a good position financially we can see what Gettleman can put together. 13 million for Hardy looks really stupid though.

 

Given what's happened, at least we just tagged him instead of a monster contract.  Also, don't look past we spent $10 mil on this secondary in the offseason.  DG worked in room to sign guys.  

 

Hardy is off the books next year.  Also, factor in the expiring contracts and potential cuts, we could have up to ~29 million to spend.  Of course we'll be considering Cam's contract but that's a lot of wiggle room regardless of Stewart, Williams, and CJ.  

 

Also, after this season, there will be no more dead money towards Beason, Anderson, Godfrey or Gross.  We're talking over $20 million in dead money this year and they will finally be off the books.  Smitty will be the only above $150,000 in 2015/16.  That's huge and honestly gives us room to cut at least half of double trouble.      

 

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the Bell move because at least he has played NFL tackle. Chandler had not. Foucalt had not. Garry Williams had a little experience but he did his usual thing (get hurt in the first week). 

 

But there is still something no one wants to consider. There are a dozen teams starting crap tackles. All of their fan bases are as irate as us. The only difference is ours are making less money. We competed with those teams for tackles and ultimately they paid a higher price for the same return.

 

I recognize that but our staff equated the mid to low-end vet FA talent available at OT to UDFAs yet trusted those low-end vet FAs at skill positions (SS, FS, CB, WR).  That, I don't get.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone keeps smack talking Gettleman for the Hardy situation. It's a bs argument an asinine statement.

What is truth is that without Hardy, our #2 defense drops to #25. I guarantee you that our DB's would be looking way better with #76 in the game. He's easily worth the $.

We hit a bad year to lose our offensive line from the previous season. There were simply no OL worth picking up, regardless of the cost. We have who we have until starting linemen become available via draft or FA.

Stop ripping Gettleman about Hardy. So sick of hearing that bs. He was well on his way to another probowl, 16+ sack season before JR pulled the plug in him which is where the true failure if this season should be placed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...