Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here's what the garbage time stats tell me.


toldozer

Recommended Posts

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

you make the assumption that Cam and Olsen still want to play for this team... right now it doesnt look like Cam wants to. and Olsen has been obviously frustrated lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

Football games are won/lost at the line of scrimmage.  So yes...improving the O-line will solve a lot of problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

Garbage time stats are called that for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen was the only stud I saw on the field, Cam had moments but also threw into coverage, locked onto receivers and showed poor mobility.

 

Why does it take us getting down by 2+ touchdowns to start targeting our TE?

 

They expect us to target our TE! Go long Cotch!

 

 

lol

 

 

at some point, you just have to laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen was the only stud I saw on the field, Cam had moments but also threw into coverage, locked onto receivers and showed poor mobility.

Why does it take us getting down by 2+ touchdowns to start targeting our TE?

The reason no receivers are open is because we only send 3 against 8 defenders. Teams can get to Cam with 4 guys Olsen and the running backs stay back to block because our offensive line is poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Webb may be our second best receiver, and its not close.

But the Huddle told me all offseason that we were fine at WR! There were some that even said this before we drafted KB

I agree with Webb though. His catch last night was the best by any WR not named KB this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were just discussing this... long bombs to Cotchery.

 

Is that Cam's call or is that the design of the play?  I mean, the DB had him easily beat every single time.

 

I kind of doubt that Newton wants his only viable deep threat to be Jerricho Cotchery at this point, lol.

 

Hell, the only true speed WR we have right now is an undrafted rookie who hasn't even been activated the last few games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...