Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would the perception be if it was Hardy who wrecked?


Ruff

Recommended Posts

who knows. what is it you want to accomplish with this? cause/blame is still under investigation. Are you trying to imply cam would be innocent because hes cam and hardy would be guilty because he has another court case. I dunno seems silly.

If this was Hardy, we would somehow be blaming it on him. We're all guilty of assuming Hardy is doing the worst thing possible, and something like this (or the report like the one came out today that Cam has 16 traffic violations in 7 years) would be another strike against his long term value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who the hell cares? why are we comparing Cam Newton and Greg Hardy, and I am probably the biggest Hardy supporter on this board. just be grateful that Cam walked out of this alive and the other driver from all accounts escaped serious injury. this is not a time to bring up the negative and try to prove points. thank god everyone is ok. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was Hardy, we would somehow be blaming it on him. We're all guilty of assuming Hardy is doing the worst thing possible, and something like this (or the report like the one came out today that Cam has 16 traffic violations in 7 years) would be another strike against his long term value.

 

disagree completly.  as like I said the accident is still under investigation, now if you are saying you would assume Hardy was guilty, thats on you, but dont assume every one thinks the same way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...