Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IF we win, we will host either ARZ or SEA


Lilsmitty09

Recommended Posts

Went through all playoff simulators, and if we win the South, we will either host ARZ or SEA. There is a HUGE chance it'll be ARZ, because it would take for Seattle to lose at home to the Rams and the Cards to beat the Niners in SF with a 4th string QB.

I wouldn't mind playing either, because we have nothing to lose coming in as the "worst playoff team ever", but it would be a pretty nice game to play Arizona - a team who is struggling with no QB and has to play on the road against a team that would be getting hot at the right time (us).

 

Then again how fitting would it be for us to knock off the world champs, who the same exact team did that when they were 7-9 to a defending world champs team in our same division.

Thoughts? I REALLY believe we could beat the Cardinals. We would then have to go to either SEA or GB/DET, but you never know...Oakland almost beat SEA in SEA this year, and any given Sunday...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm, this is a Rams team that has beaten SF, Seattle, Denver, and almost beat SD on the road.

They beat Was and Oak by a combined score of 76-0 in back to back weeks.

Not to mention this was all done without Sam Bradford. 

 

Even if Seattle loses to the Rams, I still wouldn't want Seattle. Like I said, the hottest team in the NFL right now. 

 

I don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand why green bay/ Detroit can't tie and end up fifth. Unlikely but it can happen

Lions and Packers are both 11-4. If they tie they'd be 11-4-1 and the Lions would win the division because they won the first meeting. If either the Cardinals or Seahawks lose they would be 11-5. The Packers at 11-4-1 would get the fifth seed over the Cards or Seahawks at 11-5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...