Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IF we win, we will host either ARZ or SEA


Lilsmitty09

Recommended Posts

Went through all playoff simulators, and if we win the South, we will either host ARZ or SEA. There is a HUGE chance it'll be ARZ, because it would take for Seattle to lose at home to the Rams and the Cards to beat the Niners in SF with a 4th string QB.

I wouldn't mind playing either, because we have nothing to lose coming in as the "worst playoff team ever", but it would be a pretty nice game to play Arizona - a team who is struggling with no QB and has to play on the road against a team that would be getting hot at the right time (us).

 

Then again how fitting would it be for us to knock off the world champs, who the same exact team did that when they were 7-9 to a defending world champs team in our same division.

Thoughts? I REALLY believe we could beat the Cardinals. We would then have to go to either SEA or GB/DET, but you never know...Oakland almost beat SEA in SEA this year, and any given Sunday...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm, this is a Rams team that has beaten SF, Seattle, Denver, and almost beat SD on the road.

They beat Was and Oak by a combined score of 76-0 in back to back weeks.

Not to mention this was all done without Sam Bradford. 

 

Even if Seattle loses to the Rams, I still wouldn't want Seattle. Like I said, the hottest team in the NFL right now. 

 

I don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand why green bay/ Detroit can't tie and end up fifth. Unlikely but it can happen

Lions and Packers are both 11-4. If they tie they'd be 11-4-1 and the Lions would win the division because they won the first meeting. If either the Cardinals or Seahawks lose they would be 11-5. The Packers at 11-4-1 would get the fifth seed over the Cards or Seahawks at 11-5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...