Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is a staff change out of the realm of possibility now?


@bobbyagnese

Recommended Posts

Most teams have made their staff firings and hirings. I know Ron stated that he didn't anticipate any staff changes, but the last time he said he didn't anticipate any moves, Charles Godfrey got his walking papers. Is there any reason to hold out hope that maybe, just maybe, we'll have a new ST coach by the start of 2015?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, Riverboat Ron is being Riverboat Ron and going all in with the same exact staff despite next season being playoffs or fired for him. He's got guts, gotta give him that

Nope, Riverboat Ron be damned, he is sticking with the same exact staff despite next season being playoffs or fired for him. He's got guts, gotta give him that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula-ball has us in the playoffs 2-years running. Our players are getting comfortable with the system and as much as I dislike the play-calling. It would royally suck to start over with a new OC.

 

I think people over emphasize learning a new system. Many teams have had success learning a new system their first year. Cam was explosive his first year with Chud. If shula is going to stay it shouldn't be because learning a new system is hard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gase is still laying in the cut.  Not saying he would certainly come here, but Baltimore just hired Trestman as the OC.  Not too many slots still open.  Did Foxy hire an OC yet?  If not, I could see Gase following Fox to Chicago.  Gase would be quite an improvement over Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...