Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilson for MVP....

WhoAmI?

By WhoAmI?,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WhoAmI? Newbie

WhoAmI?

Posted
Posted

Was the reason that playcall was made. There is no doubt in my mind about it. They wanted to pad Wilson's stats and make him the one to get the game winner so he was MVP of the superbowl and so he got all the headlines. Backfired on them badly. That is my only explanation when you have Beastmode on the 1 yd line, 2nd down, with 1 timeout and pass it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
Posted

It was going to be Wilsons' coming out party,  as a true elite qb..           when he marched his team down the field and threw a dart for a TD,  from the 1 yard line,  to win the SB.

 

 

 

 

The headlines were going to read "Patriots handled the Seahawks' legendary defense,  but had no answer for Wilson,  the SB QB Killer"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CelibatePimp Newbie

CelibatePimp

Posted
Posted

Was the reason that playcall was made. There is no doubt in my mind about it. They wanted to pad Wilson's stats and make him the one to get the game winner so he was MVP of the superbowl and so he got all the headlines. Backfired on them badly. That is my only explanation when you have Beastmode on the 1 yd line, 2nd down, with 1 timeout and pass it.

 

I agree with that. Hence they did not put the ball in Lynch's hands. Kinda like a statement to transition the offense over to Wilson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted

Makes total sense to me,..

 

Probably why Carrolls explanation was so ridiculous.  He should have said flat out,.."it was a touchdown throw, not high risk, and Butler made a play.  99 times out of 100 it was a touchdown, and Id call it again. "

 

That would have shut up the controversy. Now we are off deflate gate and on the endless threads with everyone now an expert on what ifs in the past.

 

Butler makes one false move and everyone is talking about how brilliant the call was, how the whole Patriots defense sold out on Marshawn,.. bla bla bla.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoAmI? Newbie

WhoAmI?

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Makes total sense to me,..

 

Probably why Carrolls explanation was so ridiculous.  He should have said flat out,.."it was a touchdown throw, not high risk, and Butler made a play.  99 times out of 100 it was a touchdown, and Id call it again. "

 

That would have shut up the controversy. Now we are off deflate gate and on the endless threads with everyone now an expert on what ifs in the past.

 

Butler makes one false move and everyone is talking about how brilliant the call was, how the whole Patriots defense sold out on Marshawn,.. bla bla bla.

 

Yeah, his explanation was weak. He actually sitting there saying they didn't run it because of their goalline package when that hadn't stopped them from still running it all year. Even Revis said in the post game that they weren't in a full goalline package. They wanted Wilson to get that game winner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted

Its always a HERO call or a GOAT(and I mean a grass eating loser, not greatest of all time) looking back.  Thats a touchdown 99 of 100.  Its not so Bevell and the gang are the WORST,....COACHES,...EVER,....

 

If Kearse catches it,..

 

Russell is the GREATEST,...QUARTERBACK,....EVER,......

 

now hes not.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...