Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers Not Expected To Bring Back Hardy


Mr Mojo Risin

Recommended Posts

You must not understand how a civil proceeding would work and the differences in what is required for a guilty verdict in a civil vs. criminal proceeding.

 

In a criminal trial, it is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt....in a civil proceeding, it is ONLY based on the preponderance of the evidence.  This is a much lower threshold.

 

Even if Hardy is found not guilt in the criminal trial, the odds of being found guilty in a civil proceeds in damn near 100%.

 

Thank you for the clear answer.  You are, of course, 100% correct.  My question was rhetorical, but it never hurts to have the clear facts states like you have above.

 

Now, that being said, how many NFL teams are going to be willing to risk signing someone that will likely be found guilty (near 100% chance, as you say) in a civil action regarding charges of domestic abuse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000469366/article/are-carolina-panthers-finished-with-greg-hardy

It's all but official now. I think this is a huge mistake Hardy was a huge part of what made our defense work. I got so much joy watching our front 4 dismantle the pocket. Hopefully we can find someone close to Hardys level.

**I KNOW THIS HAS BEEN DISCUSSED ALREADY IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO TALK ABOUT GREG HARDY DO NOT POST IN THIS THREAD, SIMPLE.

 

I agree but money talks and G-man sucks so this is our life from here on out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the clear answer. You are, of course, 100% correct. My question was rhetorical, but it never hurts to have the clear facts states like you have above.

Now, that being said, how many NFL teams are going to be willing to risk signing someone that will likely be found guilty (near 100% chance, as you say) in a civil action regarding charges of domestic abuse?

And what if the case is dropped and he is no longer considered guilty at all?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the clear answer.  You are, of course, 100% correct.  My question was rhetorical, but it never hurts to have the clear facts states like you have above.

 

Now, that being said, how many NFL teams are going to be willing to risk signing someone that will likely be found guilty (near 100% chance, as you say) in a civil action regarding charges of domestic abuse?

Civil suits are just cash right?

 

For that matter dimissed criminal cases can be reopened or resubmitted in some cases.

 

I don't think NFL teams would care. Didn't Pacman Jones have a civil suit coming at him and still played?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope he signs with the Raiders and loses the rest of his career. Before Rivera got here, Hardy was a flake who barely contributed. Fox didn't have what it took to sculpt him into a proper player. Rivera did, and I think that once he's away from Rivera on a more toxic franchise, his cute "lol Hogwarts" thing will turn into more serious character issues and a lack of contributing.

 

And this is coming from someone who is actually pretty close to Greg, given that he has pied me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't he here for one of Fox's years? It's kind of hard to blame a coach who had one season to coach a 6th round draft pick...

 

I'm not really blaming Fox, I'm blaming Hardy. His first two years were 3 sacks, 4 sacks, then his third year was 11 sacks. I think Rivera got to him and tapped into his potential. And I think once he's removed from this environment he'll regress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope he signs with the Raiders and loses the rest of his career. Before Rivera got here, Hardy was a flake who barely contributed. Fox didn't have what it took to sculpt him into a proper player. Rivera did, and I think that once he's away from Rivera on a more toxic franchise, his cute "lol Hogwarts" thing will turn into more serious character issues and a lack of contributing.

 

And this is coming from someone who is actually pretty close to Greg, given that he has pied me.

 

Huh? Hardy was here 1 year with Fox. Next year with Rivera. It takes about 3 years for DE's to grow into something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as long as NO, ATL and TB suck too.Sucking less but still sucking is no feather in anyones hat.

As difficult is this may be for you to comprehend, a GM is not judged on whether or not he signs your favorite players.

Back to back playoffs for the first time ever, a steadily improving cap situation, two good drafts in a row, one of which produced the best rookie class this team has ever seen, a team on the rise and our first playoff win since 2005...These things are what you call "continuing to suck".

That tells me clearly you haven't got a clue what you're talking about.

And if you're going to give a rebuttal, at least attempt to bring something factual to the argument, something more intellectual than "he's fat and he sucks".

I know I'm asking a lot, but you could at least try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As difficult is this may be for you to comprehend, a GM is not judged on whether or not he signs your favorite players.

Back to back playoffs for the first time ever, a steadily improving cap situation, two good drafts in a row, one of which produced the best rookie class this team has ever seen, a team on the rise and our first playoff win since 2005...These things are what you call "continuing to suck".

That tells me clearly you haven't got a clue what you're talking about.

And if you're going to give a rebuttal, at least attempt to bring something factual to the argument, something more intellectual than "he's fat and he sucks".

I know I'm asking a lot, but you could at least try.

 

he signed some bad players which is not even a question. He had to cut more than one of them before the season even finished. That is fact. sucking a little less than the big suck that was the NFC south is not something to be proud of. We had a losing record that is how you judge that is how we say continuing to suck, trending down. . That is factual.  Even the playoff win was tainted by the presence of a bad backup QB for the cards trying to limp them along.

 The cap situation just gave G-man an excuse to bargain hunt and bring in some really bad players=fact.

 Until G-man really does something the suck label stands.  So you can as a fan disagree and wear your teal colored glasses but that has nothing to do with fact. He has another chance but if we don't get better I am interested to see how you will spin it. So spare me the false superiority and if you were so worried about facts you would not have made any up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
    • He's firmly a second rounder and I don't think we would go that high for a TE this draft.  Third?  Possibly. I mean Rhule drafted Tremble in the third round who clearly was just a blocking TE.  
×
×
  • Create New...