Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy case info I hadn't seen posted here yet


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

http://blackandbluereview.com/state-of-north-carolina-greg-hardy-dismissal-documents/
 
I hadn't seen this posted here yet, but reading the dismissal document showed me some info I hadn't previously known.  For example, his charge was simply "Communicating threats".  Also, his middle name is McKaryl.  And finally, the state didn't need Holder there to proceed with the charges, but they reviewed the bench trial, her testimony, statement to the police, etc and found that it was not enough to uphold a conviction.  I should think all this helps Hardy.  Except the McKaryl part.
 
hardydismissal3.jpg?zoom=1.5&resize=791%

 

edited to correct a mistake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes there are Hardy paid to get them done on his own.

Maybe I was misinformed. I was aware Hardy's team had them. But the court doesn't have a transcript. I was under the impression prosecutors never gained access to them bc of how they were obtained

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I was misinformed. I was aware Hardy's team had them. But the court doesn't have a transcript. I was under the impression prosecutors never gained access to them bc of how they were obtained

Did u read the actual document that was posted in the OP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the op only showed the first of 3 pages of the documents, second page had charges of violence towards a female.

 

I know. It clearly says there in that image they dismissed the charges of Assault on a Female and Communicating Threats. Just wondering what he meant by that statement lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...