Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Judge overturns Peterson suspension


teeray

Recommended Posts

Devil is in the details, but this could have ramifications for Greg Hardy, especially the issues of punishment under new policies enacted after the incident occured and if commissioners exempt list considered a pre-discipline discipline

@AdamSchefter: Judge Doty has overturned Adrian Peterson decision and Peterson now will be reinstated, per source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFLPA is 2 for 2 on these appeals to courts with the new policies. I am interested to read the ruling, but it is becoming clear you can't make up a rule and then retroactively apply it to someone.

Means Hardy likely at worst would be looking at 2 game suspension.

Another big question will be whether judge had an opinion on commissioners exempt list being disciplinary in nature

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFLPA is 2 for 2 on these appeals to courts with the new policies. I am interested to read the ruling, but it is becoming clear you can't make up a rule and then retroactively apply it to someone.

Means Hardy likely at worst would be looking at 2 game suspension.

Another big question will be whether judge had an opinion on commissioners exempt list being disciplinary in nature

 

If I recall correctly, this particular judge has sided against Goodell before.

 

I think in general judges have been finding that the NFL's accounts of how things went down "less than credible".

 

Could be good for Hardy.  Still not likely to make any difference to the Panthers though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall correctly, this particular judge has sided against Goodell before.

I think in general judges have been finding that the NFL's accounts of how things went down "less than credible".

Could be good for Hardy. Still not likely to make any difference to the Panthers though.

Yes Judge Doty has sided against the NFL before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFLPA is 2 for 2 on these appeals to courts with the new policies. I am interested to read the ruling, but it is becoming clear you can't make up a rule and then retroactively apply it to someone.

Means Hardy likely at worst would be looking at 2 game suspension.

Another big question will be whether judge had an opinion on commissioners exempt list being disciplinary in nature

Why do you think 2 at worst?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think 2 at worst?

Because when the Hardy stuff happened general suspension for domestic issue was 2 games.

They retroactively created this commissioners exempt list policy, then minimum 6 game suspension.

Both Ray Rice case and this case will say you can't make new rules after the fact and try to enforce them

That is why I say worst would likely be 2 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because when the Hardy stuff happened general suspension for domestic issue was 2 games.

They retroactively created this commissioners exempt list policy, then minimum 6 game suspension.

Both Ray Rice case and this case will say you can't make new rules after the fact and try to enforce them

That is why I say worst would likely be 2 games.

But two games wasn't the rule or the general outcome as it was handled on a case by case basis. PED and Drug offenses were handled by the CBA while personal conduct issues where not. That lead to each one being handled on a case per case basis. There was no prior rule so to me any new rule can applied IMO. I'm not trying to defend the leagues handling but I don't think it's out of line much either. To me the problem is they have to set something and stick with it and not have the Guantanamo Prison thing going on.

 

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/nfl-domestic-violence-policy-suspensions/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...