Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Boykin to Visit per Rapoport


NYPantherFan

Recommended Posts

this draft class is deep at WR. (From what I jnderstand) And I would be very surprised if DG DOESNT find some good talent.

So, when you consider all the other areas we are weak as well, we can take this mean that Gettleman's plan is to go 7 for 7 on this year's picks.

I feel like there's a modicum of risk involved there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See I'm fine with your argument but the fact that you are pointing this out is making those 4-10 or so posters feel as loud as they want to be. We need speed and quickness. I made a whole thread about that last year and got blasted.

The thing is like I mentioned earlier, we've got a smart yet frugal GM who clearly has a dividing line between paying too much to fill versus back-filling in preparation for the draft. As a fan, it can be super frustrating but let's wait a little longer before giving this black & white approach to the offseason.

Can you clarify the first paragraph?

Are you saying it validates them in some way? To be clear, I was saying the receivers were the worst in the league, therefore, Cam had nothing to throw to.

And it's fine to be frugal, but there's a difference between being frugal and just being dumb. Like I pointed out earlier, Eddie Royal isn't going to cost more than 5 per, I'm guessing... Gentleman is the one that said you address areas of need in FA and then you fill the holes with the draft. He also said we need speed and would address that. And here we are, one day in, and Voth, who has been as accurate as any reporter out there, is saying we're essentially done with receiver.

That's why people are pissed. WR has been neglected since we drafted Steve Smith... I don't count colbert or Jarrett because they were second round pick with a lot of question marks... The point being, we should've either signed a bookend or used our first round pick on a tremendously talented guy instead, but we never did, and I doubt we change that this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking of 4 Huddlers right off the top of my head...but in the interest of not getting banned, I declined to be more specific.

 

But all you need to do is go back to September-November (sometimes as early as the preseason, and as late as January when we are in the playoffs) of any of the the proceeding years, and look at any of the 1000 threads critical of either of offense or newton, and then see who is creating said thread.

 

They are the same posters in this every thread preaching "we don't really need to be making any moves..." these were the same posters who last year around this time, claimed that Underwood and King was sufficient for Newton then in the Steelers game complained about Newton not being able to move the ball and keep up with Big Ben in the second half.

 

This an annual occurrence on the Huddle.  

 

No one is going to ban you for pointing out inconsistency and hypocrisy.  The record speaks for itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you clarify the first paragraph?

Are you saying it validates them in some way? To be clear, I was saying the receivers were the worst in the league, therefore, Cam had nothing to throw to.

And it's fine to be frugal, but there's a difference between being frugal and just being dumb. Like I pointed out earlier, Eddie Royal isn't going to cost more than 5 per, I'm guessing... Gentleman is the one that said you address areas of need in FA and then you fill the holes with the draft. He also said we need speed and would address that. And here we are, one day in, and Voth, who has been as accurate as any reporter out there, is saying we're essentially done with receiver.

That's why people are pissed. WR has been neglected since we drafted Steve Smith... I don't count colbert or Jarrett because they were second round pick with a lot of question marks... The point being, we should've either signed a bookend or used our first round pick on a tremendously talented guy instead, but we never did, and I doubt we change that this year.

WR Eddie Royal will be signing with The Chicago Bears. He loves Jay Cutler ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is going to ban you for pointing out inconsistency and hypocrisy.  The record speaks for itself.

 

No. Trust me, it will.

 

Once I start, a whole sh*t storm is likely to ensue. Safe to say they post here often and 2 of them have very, very high post counts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you clarify the first paragraph?

Are you saying it validates them in some way? To be clear, I was saying the receivers were the worst in the league, therefore, Cam had nothing to throw to.

And it's fine to be frugal, but there's a difference between being frugal and just being dumb. Like I pointed out earlier, Eddie Royal isn't going to cost more than 5 per, I'm guessing... Gentleman is the one that said you address areas of need in FA and then you fill the holes with the draft. He also said we need speed and would address that. And here we are, one day in, and Voth, who has been as accurate as any reporter out there, is saying we're essentially done with receiver.

That's why people are pissed. WR has been neglected since we drafted Steve Smith... I don't count colbert or Jarrett because they were second round pick with a lot of question marks... The point being, we should've either signed a bookend or used our first round pick on a tremendously talented guy instead, but we never did, and I doubt we change that this year.

5 mill a year for Eddie Royal is way to much and I'm a Hokie Homer. We need an upgrade at WR. It clear and has been clear since we had Moose and Smith play together. What if we draft a WR in round 1 or 2? People on here will celebrate and call it a victory but yet cam still has the same quality of protection last year. Its day one of FA. We didnt sign anyone on day one last year, and honestly I can't remember the last time, even when Hurney was here with Cap space we signed a big splash at WR. Keyshawn is the last one and that was a one year rental with my last memory of him was taking a flea flicker and throwing a INT in the end zone against the cow boys.

Name someone the last 3-4 years that was a day one FA WR that got paid big money and has earned it and the team hasnt had buyers remorse. I bet we aren't done with WR unless the team is really high on Corey Brown and KB.

Last year at this time we didn't even know who Norwell or Brown was yet we found them brought them in and expect them to contribute day one this year. That's a sign of a team that is building something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB is a glorified Plaxico with less consistent hands right now.

We need speed, preferably with size and hands. Ginn only has one of those traits. He is not the answer. We need a #2 and likely an established #3. That's where interviewing Boykin is incendiary. It's insulting. People are tired of being jerked around and having our time wasted. Barely making the playoffs each year isn't good enough. We want a superbowl. The defense is in really good shape,so we should be addressing weaknesses while maintaining that, and we're not.

It's really simple... If Boykin and other receivers of his similar lack of ability are the only guys signed, let's revisit this thread in October or November and see what is over reactive.

We went through the same thing last year. I promise you, it may be slightly exaggerated but not by much... If I wasn't on my phone I would pull up the cotchery thread from last year and show you. The vast majority that were being level-headed and excited at that big pickup last off season were collectively losing their poo and questioning if cam should be benched in favor of DA because he was eating grass as soon as the ball was snapped.

The same people each year are saying, "calm down, their professionals. They get paid for a reason. Go play Madden,crybabies,"and only less than a handful are still riding that wave when guys like cotch are stopping on routes and tipping ints up into defenders arms while making our franchise QB look like poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you clarify the first paragraph?

Are you saying it validates them in some way? To be clear, I was saying the receivers were the worst in the league, therefore, Cam had nothing to throw to.

And it's fine to be frugal, but there's a difference between being frugal and just being dumb. Like I pointed out earlier, Eddie Royal isn't going to cost more than 5 per, I'm guessing... Gentleman is the one that said you address areas of need in FA and then you fill the holes with the draft. He also said we need speed and would address that. And here we are, one day in, and Voth, who has been as accurate as any reporter out there, is saying we're essentially done with receiver.

That's why people are pissed. WR has been neglected since we drafted Steve Smith... I don't count colbert or Jarrett because they were second round pick with a lot of question marks... The point being, we should've either signed a bookend or used our first round pick on a tremendously talented guy instead, but we never did, and I doubt we change that this year.

 

To clarify the first paragraph: The ratio of people content with no splash versus those actually expecting these signings to be something special is like 30:1.  Just temper yourself with your generalizations is all I'm saying. 

 

Also, this mid tier market you're referring to is the tricky one in the FA.  We don't really know the bidding game going on about these guys.  People were expecting Derrick Newton, Searcy, Parnell to at least be reasonable and look what happened. 

 

So, when we don't get one of these perceived mid-tiers, it begs these questions and frustration when in reality, GMs look to find that point where maybe they don't want to invest a certain amount versus rather waiting it out for the next opportunity.  There's always that point, it just varies GM to GM and DG very much so seems to trust his own instincts with identify incoming NFL talent.     

 

Royal was who I wanted and I've mentioned that a handful of times...but he's been signed Chicago so I'm not going to fret over that.

 

And notice what he's said: "address areas of need in the FA" and "fill holes through the draft"

 

That doesn't guarantee the free agency signings are filling our holes, rather addressing areas of need. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 mill a year for Eddie Royal is way to much and I'm a Hokie Homer. We need an upgrade at WR. It clear and has been clear since we had Moose and Smith play together. What if we draft a WR in round 1 or 2? People on here will celebrate and call it a victory but yet cam still has the same quality of protection last year. Its day one of FA. We didnt sign anyone on day one last year, and honestly I can't remember the last time, even when Hurney was here with Cap space we signed a big splash at WR. Keyshawn is the last one and that was a one year rental with my last memory of him was taking a flea flicker and throwing a INT in the end zone against the cow boys.

Name someone the last 3-4 years that was a day one FA WR that got paid big money and has earned it and the team hasnt had buyers remorse. I bet we aren't done with WR unless the team is really high on Corey Brown and KB.

Last year at this time we didn't even know who Norwell or Brown was yet we found them brought them in and expect them to contribute day one this year. That's a sign of a team that is building something.

I was saying 5 mil as the highest possible salary... I doubt he gets that, I think 3 mil per sounds fair.

But the point remains... It's not about any one thing here, PB. It's all of the factors combined. Boykin is slow, we need speed. Boykin is a guy that will be available late in the FA game, and we have him set up for a visit on the first day. Gettleman said we would address WR through FA so that were not drafting based on need, now Voth is reporting that we're basically done with WR in FA.

That is why this is so frustrating.

Same poo, different year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was saying 5 mil as the highest possible salary... I doubt he gets that, I think 3 mil per sounds fair.

But the point remains... It's not about any one thing here, PB. It's all of the factors combined. Boykin is slow, we need speed. Boykin is a guy that will be available late in the FA game, and we have him set up for a visit on the first day. Gettleman said we would address WR through FA so that were not drafting based on need, now Voth is reporting that we're basically done with WR in FA.

That is why this is so frustrating.

Same poo, different year.

I understand what your saying and I know people hold Voth in high regard but I can't imagine the team not adding any more talent or competition at WR. Its the first day, we had already signed (technically) 4 players before today. Dave seems to have a plan and knows what he wants. At this point I have to kinda go with it. It has gotten excitement from the fan base we've never seen since early 2000's and back to back playoff births.

Just an example but the Patriots signed one guy today. One. Some WR I've never heard of from Miami. Yet they might lose out on their best CB.

Eddie Royal or a player like him isn't the answer. People complained about Boykin's year's, Eddie hasnt out produced his rookie year since entering the leauge in 2008 and averages 500 yards a year, that's what we got out of Cotch. Id rather us find players who fit what we are aiming for than force a round peg in a square hole. I can't imagine us really breaking the bank on a FA WR unless we are one piece from a super bowl. Right now Oline is a bigger need

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Canales comes back and Bryce doesn’t I would probably prefer to bring in 3 guys he likes from around the league or maybe outside a top ten pick and work through them, give that a shot. Because if we win a few more games we won’t be in the running for the top rated QB prospects anyway. 
    • You mean tepper but yeah I agree about rhule   Baker is a top 3 potential qb that is play for mvp and he is doing it with a slew of injuries
    • There’s too many to reply to so I’ll just say a couple more things then I’m out: 1. It hasn’t been both ways and that’s the point. People saying stuff like “too bad Bryce Young didn’t make that tackle” is a direct result of the ridiculousness of blaming Bryce Young for literally everything. I remember one game day thread a poster unironically blamed Bryce Young for JT Sanders flipping onto his own neck and injuring himself. That post was pied. I literally just read a post blaming Bryce Young for XL dropping a ball on a would-be game winning drive last year. This past week, when Tmac bounced a ball off his hands for an interception, Bryce Young was immediately blamed in the game day thread. Alternatively, people who try to give credit to Bryce Young are immediately told that to credit Bryce Young is taking away credit from Rico Dowdle, OL, whoever, and that they shouldn’t be talking positively about Bryce Young because he doesn’t deserve any credit. 2. Yes, there have always been bad posters, the difference is that back then they were largely derided. Bryce Young’s rookie season, when many of us were simply pointing at the train wreck of the whole team and saying it was maybe a little tough to evaluate Bryce Young when he had no time to throw and slow receivers, and just saying basic stuff like “Bryce Young can physically throw the ball further than 20 yards.” There was an attempt made to limit all those opinions to a single thread, by a mod. This is like saying lunatics running the asylum is normal because there have always been lunatics in the asylum. The difference is before they were patients, now they’re in charge. 3. I know for a fact I am labeled as one of the “Bryce Stans” by many of the usual suspects, but the fact of the matter is they have no idea what my position is on Bryce Young because any attempts at nuanced discussion in the past have been so completely pointless due to never being able to get past the hyperbole. How can we have a serious conversation if you insist he is physically incapable of throwing a football 20 yards? Or if you insist that he somehow duped the Panthers into drafting him just by drinking water? Or if you insist that he should be able to succeed behind one of the worst offensive lines I’ve ever seen (rookie year, not now). And I’m not the only one, there are many who have left the huddle because of it and started a discord server, I’m just too lazy for another app.
×
×
  • Create New...