-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
.thumb.JPG.bd4130b85f61683f8be1be1422df8162.JPG)
By UnluckyforSome · Posted
I will not further hijack this thread, so this is it for me, as this is becoming more suited for draft talk. When we let Burns go, well he is only so-so and we can find better pass rushers and more productive pass rushers. We haven't. That isn't so much an endorsement on Burns, but more an indictment on our emphasis on pass rush. To that end, we deserve what we have. 18 sacks. Virtually no pressure. The leader being our do-it-all seemingly only defensive player that makes an consistent impact on games. With something like 6 sacks. It's a pathetic number for an NFL team to post. If we go wr, he better be the 2nd coming of Rice, Moss and T.O. to warrant a selection. -
By kungfoodude · Posted
Evero is a very mixed bag. His scheme is capable of hiding some personnel deficiencies while dramatically amplifying others. The one thing I will fully admit is that we can actually do far worse than Evero, although I would like to make a change there. My personal expectation would be that we would immediately make a very bad DC hire when/if he leaves. I don't believe that Canales/Tepper will be able to get a high caliber coordinator to be interested for several reasons. Not the least of which being this defense is constructed very, very poorly(for which Evero deserves at least some of the blame). One thing that seems to be a small positive is that DC does appear to let Evero basically completely run that defense without a ton of input. So that level of autonomy might be attractive to a few candidates. -
By mrcompletely11 · Posted
Thats my guy, kid is insane
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.