Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's a shame.


Moose87Banks

Recommended Posts

I fully believe if MKG played at least 76 games this year, Hornerts would've been a lock to be 7 or 8 in the playoffs. Despite all the injuries they've sustained. They would be in the playoffs if he hadn't have been injured. I wish he did play, he gets better every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loosely followed, turned the game on when we got within 10 in the 4th, saw kemba do some things, but it was like it has been all year... We were just doing our time on the treadmill... Doing a lot of moving but not going anywhere. That was our season in a nutshell.

I still have a hard time accepting losing, but there's no hope for this team. I:be reached my limit with seeing guys like JT, PJ, and Noah rot on the bench while Clifford's vet faves contribute to the running in place... I can't put my finger on it, but something has been amiss from that opening night on and knowing how Clifford is with rookies, I have little hope for next season even with a lottery pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize they are different sports but anyone who complains about the Panthers not being able to "win" the offseason needs to take a long walk down memory lane at this Hornets year and remember that this team went from one of the brightest futures in the NBA to the Bobcats in new colors via a series of failed offseason moves thought to be good for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize they are different sports but anyone who complains about the Panthers not being able to "win" the offseason needs to take a long walk down memory lane at this Hornets year and remember that this team went from one of the brightest futures in the NBA to the Bobcats in new colors via a series of failed offseason moves thought to be good for the team.

Yep they definitely managed to somehow kill all that momentum and goodwill they garnered from the Hornets rebrand. The net effect of these offseason signings has been a far worse defensive team and a less efficient offensive team. If Hayward had worked out this team would be much better. He would have fit right in with what we needed. As it turns out, Lance was the worst possible fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is a shame is having to watch Jeffrey Taylor and Jason Maxiel. Jeffrey Taylor just looks like he has no confidence at all. Maxiel tries hard but the problem, which isn't his, is that I do not want to see a guy who can't shoot when we need guys in the 4 who can shoot!! Put in Vonleh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...