Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Receiver, Tackle, Cornerback, and Safety


davos

Recommended Posts

...and DE....

 

WR:

 

Benjamin

Cotchery

Ginn

Brown

Boykin

Bersin

Lucas

that really fast tall guy

 

OT:

 

Remmers

Oher

Chandler

Martin

Foucault

PS: Wallace

 

 

CB:

 

Norman

Benwikere

Tillman

White

Teddy W.

Byndom

 

 

S:

 

Harper

Boston

Coleman

Jones

Lester

McFadden

 

 

DE:

 

Johnson

Ealy

Addison

Horton

Alexander

 

--

 

How would you rate these at the "holy sh*t, we need help" spectrum?"

 

Me? At the end of the day, I'm coming back to this:

 

1-OT 2-WR 3-S

 

as the top 3.  Whatsayyou?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Two OTs

2. A 1a/b WR

3. A S (whichever Boston isn't best suited for, I still haven't decided for myself)

4. A starting RDE unless either Alexander or Ealy are truly ready for the role

5. A 1b RB

6. An OLB

 

The Tillman signing makes me agree with this.  I was really thinking CB early (which can still happen bc of the talent) but the needs for me are pretty much this.  I know people are high on Boston at FS but a legit box-type SS to complement Luke at MLB would be money too.  It's why I've warmed up to Collins recently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's obvious we need another pass rusher. Gettleman hasen't even brought in a vet for the rotation which almost confirms my thoughts that Odi has a high probability of being the pick at 25...This also would give us leverage with CJ next year who will be a huge chunk of our cap space that should really only be paid to QBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's obvious we need another pass rusher. Gettleman hasen't even brought in a vet for the rotation which almost confirms my thoughts that Odi has a high probability of being the pick at 25...This also would give us leverage with CJ next year who will be a huge chunk of our cap space that should really only be paid to QBs

 

You Still have to out score the other team. The OT's available at 25 would be far better than the DE's available at 25.

 

 

OT > DE  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's obvious we need another pass rusher. Gettleman hasen't even brought in a vet for the rotation which almost confirms my thoughts that Odi has a high probability of being the pick at 25...This also would give us leverage with CJ next year who will be a huge chunk of our cap space that should really only be paid to QBs

Are you giving up on Ealy already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...