Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So...How do you play it?


iamhubby1

Recommended Posts

Let's say Peanut comes to camp ready to take over that #2CB slot. Putting Norman at #1, and Bene' in the slot. That is 3 pretty darn good CBs. How do we play it?

Conventional wisdom would dictate putting Norman on the #1WR, and let Peanut take the #2. As Josh has shown the ability to do well against good competition, this seems to make a lot of sense. If Peanut can hold his own. And if Bene' shows any growth, this would seem to be an ideal situation.

Now, even as good as this sounds. Players get beat, mistakes happen, and big plays are the results. Which means, we would still most likely have to keep both Safeties back on most plays. On most plays, 2 high Safeties would be over-kill, cuz Norman and Peanut will do their jobs well. But just for insurance sake, keeping both Safeties back just makes sense.

But...let's flip the script. Let's put Norman on the #2, and Peanut on the #1. We give Peanut Safety help over the top, and let Norman blanket his guy. This allows one of our Safeties to roam. He can blitz occasionally. Or he can cheat in coverage on Bene' or Peanut. Point being, With only 1 Safety deep, you can get creative with your schemes.

Best case; Norman can shut down most #2 WRs. And Peanut, with Safety help, should limit what a #1 can do. Making the need for 2 deep Safeties rather superfluous.

I know it sounds backwards to flip Norman and Peanut. I was just thinking it would give us more flexibility.

tl/dr version. Read it anyway you lazy potlicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just play sides like the Seachickens do. If Tillman can play to his capabilities we'll have 2 shutdown corners outside and Bene can lock down the slot. If Tillman plays like he did in 2012 and we draft Collins and Tre improves we could have a top 3-5 secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have Norman always on the #1 and switch between Tillman and Bene depending on who the #2 is.

 

Tillman matches up better with taller, older, and slower #2 WRs like Vincent Jackson, Marques Colston, Roddy White, and Andre Johnson.

 

Bene would cover the faster, younger, and shorter #2 WRs like Randall Cobb, Victor Cruz, DeSean Jackson, and T.Y. Hilton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just play sides like the Seachickens do. If Tillman can play to his capabilities we'll have 2 shutdown corners outside and Bene can lock down the slot. If Tillman plays like he did in 2012 and we draft Collins and Tre improves we could have a top 3-5 secondary.

I really don't like that strategy because it lets the other team dictate the matchups.

Fox stubbornly stuck to that against Arizona back in 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have Norman always on the #1 and switch between Tillman and Bene depending on who the #2 is.

Tillman matches up better with taller, older, and slower #2 WRs like Vincent Jackson, Marques Colston, Roddy White, and Andre Johnson.

Bene would cover the faster, younger, and shorter #2 WRs like Randall Cobb, Victor Cruz, DeSean Jackson, and T.Y. Hilton.

That could work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have Norman always on the #1 and switch between Tillman and Bene depending on who the #2 is.

 

Tillman matches up better with taller, older, and slower #2 WRs like Vincent Jackson, Marques Colston, Roddy White, and Andre Johnson.

 

Bene would cover the faster, younger, and shorter #2 WRs like Randall Cobb, Victor Cruz, DeSean Jackson, and T.Y. Hilton.

I understand what you are saying. And for the most part, this would seem to be the way to go. However, playing that scheme would mean both Safeties staying back. Because you have to protect against the big plays.

My only reason for wanting to switch Peanut and Norman would be for scheme flexibility. For the ability to get our Safeties moving. After all, in today's NFL confusing QBs is not an easy task. If we have the chance to mix things up. Why not?

If you trust Norman on the #2, and Bene' on the slot, you may be able to get by with only 1 safety deep. Giving us flexibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure if they are happy but realize they can’t upgrade everything this year and are content with the group
    • Bryce among the 7 players Mark Ross of NFL.com guarantees will get better this season. Today, I am identifying seven players who I guarantee will improve on their 2024 output in the 2025 season. Young took tremendous strides in 2024 after returning to the starting lineup in Week 8 following his benching. He looked far more comfortable in his return and produced with consistency, as he threw for 2,104 yards with 15 TDs and six INTs in the final 10 contests. Most important perhaps is Young's confidence grew immensely down the stretch, leading Carolina to either a game-tying or game-winning drive in six of those games. Now he enters his second season in Dave Canales' system with his best supporting cast to date. The Panthers drafted wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan eighth overall to pair with Adam Thielen and Xavier Legette, who I also believe is poised for a breakout campaign this fall. The 18th-ranked rushing attack from a year ago added Rico Dowdle to complement Chuba Hubbard, giving the team a pair of 1,000-yard rushers. The Panthers have taken the necessary steps to ensure Young's third season will be the best of his career, and now it's up to him to not only continue to grow as a player but prove why he was worthy of being taken No. 1 overall in 2023. I believe that's what he will do. https://www.nfl.com/news/which-nfl-players-will-improve-in-2025-c-j-stroud-deebo-samuel-among-guaranteed-risers  
    • While it's fair to question how impactful a player's relationship with a coach is (especially if someone has questions regarding said coach), it's important to also evaluate the difference between the players here. Jordan Fuller was pick #199 in the 6th round while Justin Simmons was #98 in the 3rd round. Jordan Fuller might have gotten a Super Bowl ring while he was with the Rams, but he got it while on the IR. Justin Simmons, on the other hand, is a x2 Pro-Bowler (2020, 2023), x4 second-team All-Pro (2019, 2021 - 2023), and was the NFL co-leader in INTs (2022). Simmons has also fallen off in the last couple of seasons though, grade-wise. He very well might not be that same player, which could be why the Falcons have elected to replace him with Fuller. As far as getting the best out of what he has, asking him to produce with a starting DL of A'Shawn Robinson (63.56% of the defense's snaps), LaBryan Ray (51.48%), and Shy Tuttle (50.08%) isn't reasonable. Wonnum only played in 8 games, but had the second most % of snaps (37.27%) at EDGE behind Clowney (53.53%). The second-string DL based on snap % was... and don't read this if you just ate... Charles Harris (34.48%), DeShawn Williams (27.67%), and Nick Thurman (19.7%). The second-string EDGEs based on snap count would be DJ Johnson (32.27%) and Cam Gill (18.14%). With the investments made in the run defense this season though, especially on the defensive line, it's more than fair to demand a complete turn around from last season.
×
×
  • Create New...