Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Mike Remmers

Roebling

By Roebling,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Roebling Newbie

Roebling

Posted
Posted

This guy was rated positively by PFF in pass protection, and was an adequate run blocker.... Do the Panthers need to upgrade him? Is he simply a solid NFL backup? Is he someone you build on? It's just some questions for tonight. There are a lot of potential RT's in this draft, but do we actually need that? With a positive pass protection rating, do we need to use a first rounder on this position?

Similar could be said of our interior. We have two solid guards in Norwell and Turner, and a backup with raw talent in Amini. Do we need to spend one of our top two picks on either guard spots or RT? Just some food for thought. 

I was thinking about Flowers more and more as it gets closer. He and Peat I think are the best in this draft, in regards to game readiness for the LT spot. We would be lucky if one fell. I'm not so sure Remmers needs to be taken out. Especially with plenty of talented players in other positions, that we need help with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted

It should be noted that his weekly PFF grade declined as he started more games. Did teams get tape on him which allowed them to exploit some flaws they discovered? He had basically never played before so that's a possibility that can't be discounted. Right now I'm extremely hopeful for him, but at the same time there is a reason we were his 6th team in 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Servant of Cthululelei Newbie

Servant of Cthululelei

Posted
Posted

It should be noted that his weekly PFF grade declined as he started more games. Did teams get tape on him which allowed them to exploit some flaws they discovered? He had basically never played before so that's a possibility that can't be discounted. Right now I'm extremely hopeful for him, but at the same time there is a reason we were his 6th team in 3 years.

 

 

That goes both ways though.  Guys who just aren't up to snuff don't get SIX tries.  Clearly there's something that six different teams have seen to bring the guy in, but it just so happens that we were the first team for which he actually produced on the field.  No way to tell if he can maintain it though.  Too small a sample.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurb Newbie

Kurb

Posted
Posted

Good depth, and that's about it IMO. He played well all things considered last year...but I tend to think it was more a flash in the pan, than a sign of things to come. 

 

I prefer the Panthers assume this about all the positions to be honest.

 

Remmers bounced around for a while before coming here.

We have to decide if his play was "flash in the pan" or "finally found a fit".

 

Rich Gannon happenings do exist, but they are rare.

 

I'd love Remmers and Norwell to be ballers and the only fight in camp on the OL is for LT. History tells us both 3 OLine spots need competition and skill/talent upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...