Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL says Pats guilty, and Brady knew


Recommended Posts

You do realize that Brady's stats in the 2nd half of the AFC title game, AFTER the refs had fixed the inflation of the footballs, were better than his stats in the 1st half, right?

Right?

 

you do realize brady benefited from using deflated balls prior to the afc championship game, right? they cheat there way to get to the afc championship game, right? you do realize they deflated balls because brady felt like it improved his performance, right? i mean, they didn't deflate the footballs to make it more difficult on themselves, right? you do realize balls below 12.5 psi is against the rules of NFL...all 32 teams teams, right?????? RIGHT?????? RIGHT????????YOU DO REALIZE THAT NFL RULES APPLY TO THE PARTIOTS AND TOM BRADY TOO, RIGHT?????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you do realize brady benefited from using deflated balls prior to the afc championship game, right? they cheat there way to get to the afc championship game, right? you do realize they deflated balls because brady felt like it improved his performance, right? i mean, they didn't deflate the footballs to make it more difficult on themselves, right? you do realize balls below 12.5 psi is against the rules of NFL...all 32 teams teams, right?????? RIGHT?????? RIGHT????????YOU DO REALIZE THAT NFL RULES APPLY TO THE PARTIOTS AND TOM BRADY TOO, RIGHT?????????

I can assure you he's not a Brady homer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well its never Lucks fault.

 

oh of course it wouldn't be.

 

one of our resident luck boosters was going around this site prior to the afc championship game going "you cam huggers just wait and see; don't say i didn't warn you when luck takes an injured way less talented colts team into foxborough and punches their ticket to the super bowl" or something to that effect.  then they got blown out of the stadium lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is actually quite easy to see if you read the word in context of how it is used in the report. Investigations, whether they are criminal in nature or internal to an organization, require a burden of proof to either substantiate or unsubstantiate the claims. By using that language in the report, the investigator was merely saying, "The burden has been met."

But you all can keep your panties in a was if you'd like.

No panties here just everything you wrote was almost verbatim was what Florio said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No panties here just everything you wrote was almost verbatim was what Florio said.

I had no idea of what Florio wrote. I just deal with all these burdens of proof on a day-to-day basis in my job. Thought the ones making a big deal of the word "probable" we're just missing the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Bama Panther, on 07 May 2015 - 11:53 AM, said:
I had no idea of what Florio wrote. I just deal with all these burdens of proof on a day-to-day basis in my job. Thought the ones making a big deal of the word "probable" we're just missing the point.
 

Everyone upset about the word "probable" should read the word in context. The word describes the burden of proof used during the investigation, which sounds to be proof by a preponderance of the evidence. That is a legal standard much lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and it essentially means "the greater probability of the evidence," i.e. more probable than not.

 

 

From Mike Florio:

“More probable than not” equates to a “preponderance of the evidence,” the standard that applies in most civil lawsuits. It means that the evidence makes it more likely than not, in the opinion of the investigator, that “New England Patriots personnel participated in violations of the Playing Rules and were involved in a deliberate effort to circumvent the rules,” and that “Tom Brady . . . was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities.”

 

I was being cheeky.

 

As I stated, sounds like what you said is what Mike Florio said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm honestly not that big a fan of Giselle.

me neither. I'm happy for Brady that he thinks she's gorgeous (and all that matters is what he thinks), but beauty is in the eye of the beholder and Giselle is a pretty girl in some pictures, but not pretty enough for my tastes. I'm more attracted to every girl I've been with than I am to Giselle (and I'm talking about at first sight, not as they got more and more attractive to me the more and more i liked them as a person). And there plenty of NFL players have wives that I think are really really pretty, like Romo's wife here:

candice-crawford.jpg

candice_crawford_6.jpg

loloblog3.jpg

loloblog.jpg

article-1392020-0c56295700000578-594_468

hawkins-romo-first%20pic-tony-romo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No lie… to this day, and forever, I’m always still gonna love me some Ted Ginn.  I tell people all the time who aren’t Panther fans so they don’t know - Ted legit was our best receiver during Cam’s tenure here.
    • That game made me resign from my position as HC of UNC in my solo football dynasty on NCAA26.
    • Nah, what he did in Cleveland was damn impressive.     ain’t no way in hell we (it’s my alma mater) should’ve looked like this tonight.  That was piss poor coaching and piss poor playing.  Like they said, for both teams, this was a similar setting to when TCU played Colorado when Deion was hired.  TCU coming in to play a game against a super famous football celebrity figure with a completely overhauled roster - difference is, Colorado played up to the moment.  We just folded like a cheap lawn chair.  I was joking during the game with friends, like they really watched a whole summer of Gio and Max and decided Gio was the starter?  Hell, I bet Bryce Baker as a freshman is better than Gio.  We hyped that signing of Gio like we just won the fuging lottery, and he is complete ass.  We spent two quarters desperately not trying to throw the football - I don’t know if it’s because he can’t or what?  But there was no excuse for that.  It felt so much like the Rhule years here.  I haven’t seen such a dysfunctional offense since or before.  And then the damn defense…. I asked my friend if they just brought all 70 new guys in from a lab that does arm and leg transplants because did these guys just receive their limbs and are figuring out how to use them???  Because I have never seen a whole team look so inept.  Diving early at feet and missing them entirely, getting trucked, flailing and falling everywhere, peewee league arm tackles, always looking a step slow…  no lie, whatever the worse I could’ve imagined that debut going, take that and make it 10 times worse and I never would’ve even seen THAT happening.  Absolutely no excuse for it.  None.  All the brand power and image brought with the Belichick hire, and that’s the best he could do in his debut.  They brought MJ, LT, and Roy out for THAT???  Man, I spent 7 years of my life living there and i NEVER saw or heard of LT coming out there during that time.  They actually got him coming around to watch THAT. Bill should be fuging embarrassed.  The fuging commentary booth brought a dog in and put a headset on him as Rece Davis said, “the wheels are off, ladies and gentlemen.”  As I said elsewhere - not under Mack 1.0, not under Torbush, not under Butch, not under Fedora,  and not under Mack 2.0, did we EVER look like THAT.  Never.  You bring in a guy that is considered one of the greatest football minds in coaching EVER, and we get shellacked and don’t even look competitive???  Boy I know the boosters are shitting fuging fireballs right now.
×
×
  • Create New...