Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL says Pats guilty, and Brady knew


Recommended Posts

You do realize that Brady's stats in the 2nd half of the AFC title game, AFTER the refs had fixed the inflation of the footballs, were better than his stats in the 1st half, right?

Right?

 

you do realize brady benefited from using deflated balls prior to the afc championship game, right? they cheat there way to get to the afc championship game, right? you do realize they deflated balls because brady felt like it improved his performance, right? i mean, they didn't deflate the footballs to make it more difficult on themselves, right? you do realize balls below 12.5 psi is against the rules of NFL...all 32 teams teams, right?????? RIGHT?????? RIGHT????????YOU DO REALIZE THAT NFL RULES APPLY TO THE PARTIOTS AND TOM BRADY TOO, RIGHT?????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you do realize brady benefited from using deflated balls prior to the afc championship game, right? they cheat there way to get to the afc championship game, right? you do realize they deflated balls because brady felt like it improved his performance, right? i mean, they didn't deflate the footballs to make it more difficult on themselves, right? you do realize balls below 12.5 psi is against the rules of NFL...all 32 teams teams, right?????? RIGHT?????? RIGHT????????YOU DO REALIZE THAT NFL RULES APPLY TO THE PARTIOTS AND TOM BRADY TOO, RIGHT?????????

I can assure you he's not a Brady homer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well its never Lucks fault.

 

oh of course it wouldn't be.

 

one of our resident luck boosters was going around this site prior to the afc championship game going "you cam huggers just wait and see; don't say i didn't warn you when luck takes an injured way less talented colts team into foxborough and punches their ticket to the super bowl" or something to that effect.  then they got blown out of the stadium lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is actually quite easy to see if you read the word in context of how it is used in the report. Investigations, whether they are criminal in nature or internal to an organization, require a burden of proof to either substantiate or unsubstantiate the claims. By using that language in the report, the investigator was merely saying, "The burden has been met."

But you all can keep your panties in a was if you'd like.

No panties here just everything you wrote was almost verbatim was what Florio said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No panties here just everything you wrote was almost verbatim was what Florio said.

I had no idea of what Florio wrote. I just deal with all these burdens of proof on a day-to-day basis in my job. Thought the ones making a big deal of the word "probable" we're just missing the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Bama Panther, on 07 May 2015 - 11:53 AM, said:
I had no idea of what Florio wrote. I just deal with all these burdens of proof on a day-to-day basis in my job. Thought the ones making a big deal of the word "probable" we're just missing the point.
 

Everyone upset about the word "probable" should read the word in context. The word describes the burden of proof used during the investigation, which sounds to be proof by a preponderance of the evidence. That is a legal standard much lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and it essentially means "the greater probability of the evidence," i.e. more probable than not.

 

 

From Mike Florio:

“More probable than not” equates to a “preponderance of the evidence,” the standard that applies in most civil lawsuits. It means that the evidence makes it more likely than not, in the opinion of the investigator, that “New England Patriots personnel participated in violations of the Playing Rules and were involved in a deliberate effort to circumvent the rules,” and that “Tom Brady . . . was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities.”

 

I was being cheeky.

 

As I stated, sounds like what you said is what Mike Florio said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm honestly not that big a fan of Giselle.

me neither. I'm happy for Brady that he thinks she's gorgeous (and all that matters is what he thinks), but beauty is in the eye of the beholder and Giselle is a pretty girl in some pictures, but not pretty enough for my tastes. I'm more attracted to every girl I've been with than I am to Giselle (and I'm talking about at first sight, not as they got more and more attractive to me the more and more i liked them as a person). And there plenty of NFL players have wives that I think are really really pretty, like Romo's wife here:

candice-crawford.jpg

candice_crawford_6.jpg

loloblog3.jpg

loloblog.jpg

article-1392020-0c56295700000578-594_468

hawkins-romo-first%20pic-tony-romo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is what it said about him coming out of college: Overview A three-year starter with good feet and technique, Samac could be in consideration for a move-blocking rushing attack. He is strong at the point of attack but will have limitations against NFL power. He operates with good hand placement and nimble feet and is a demon once he’s on the move as a pulling center leading the way. He’s fluid and agile in the run game, but those traits fail to do as much for him in protection. Samac punches with inside hands but can struggle to widen his protection base in order to protect his edges. He has eventual starting talent as a run blocker but needs to add more mass and improve in pass protection to get there.
    • Through 2 games cltfc has 12 shot attempts. Opponents 23 shots on target. Attack sucks, Defense definitely sucks. Kahlina is the only reason they haven't given up 14 goals in two games. 
    • I met a few times--never liked him. I figured he might have had a bad day--but then realized that he must have a lot of bad days. Once he raised his voice at my son because my son did not understand a question when SS was signing his jersey.  I wanted the jersey to represent his encounter with a Panther great, not some small man with a bad attitude.  I told me son, "Forget it.  He was asking you what your name is (My son was about 7 and told me that he thought Smitty was going to write (my son's) name on the jersey.  He said "Dad, I thought he was supposed to write HIS name on the jersey, not mine."  I said, "He was personalizing it, writing it to you--like a birthday card."  He is now grown, and he has a steve smith Jersey that is framed and matted.  He keeps it is his closet.  I asked him, "Why not have that out on your wall?"  He said, "All I remember is an A-hole scribbled on my shirt.  I don't remember a legend or hero.  But he had a Jake Delhomme Jersey on his wall.  "Jake was great.  I will always remember that."  (Jake stayed and talked to us for about 5 minutes or more--GREAT guy.)
×
×
  • Create New...