Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers LB Ahmad Brooks accused of sexual assualt (by same woman w/Ray Mcdonald!)

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted
San Francisco 49ers linebacker Ahmad Brooks has been accused of sexually assaulting a passed out woman at a then-teammate's home ... according to a lawsuit obtained by TMZ Sports.
 
The woman making the allegations is the same woman who previously claimed she was raped by Ray McDonald ... a former 49ers defensive end who now plays for the Chicago Bears. 
 
McDonald had sued the woman for defamation ... after the San Jose PD investigated the allegations but dropped the case due to insufficient evidence. 
 
Now, the woman is firing back in the defamation lawsuit -- claiming she believes there is SURVEILLANCE VIDEO from the night in question ... which shows part of the alleged sexual assault. 
 
According to the docs obtained by TMZ Sports, the woman says on December 14th, 2014 she was at McDonald's home and slipped and fell on the deck around his swimming pool, knocking herself unconscious for more than 8 minutes. 
While she was blacked out, the woman claims the video will show McDonald's friend Brooks "groped her person in a sexual manner."
 
She claims McDonald then carried her up to his bedroom where he had sex with her ... without her consent. 
 
The woman is going after McDonald for assault and battery, false imprisonment and infliction of emotional distress. Ditto for Brooks. 
We've reached out to Brooks for comment -- so far, no word back. 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ecu88 Newbie

ecu88

Posted
Posted

Wonder if this'll be investigated by the police officer who works part time for the 49ers, like the first incident was.

Lol wow I forgot about that.......no bias in the investigation whatsoever amirite :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

Whew so glad we're not the team that's going to be blitzed by the media. 49ers are in for long rough downhill ride into franchise purgatory. Brooks is done for this season and the next. I predicted that there would be suspensions this season and here they fuging come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersUnited Newbie

PanthersUnited

Posted
Posted

Whew so glad we're not the team that's going to be blitzed by the media. 49ers are in for long rough downhill ride into franchise purgatory. Brooks is done for this season and the next. I predicted that there would be suspensions this season and here they fuging come.

So the next question is, who will the 49ers select no 1 overall next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

So the next question is, who will the 49ers select no 1 overall next year?

 

This will be the 3rd starting LB they've lost unexpectedly, so I'm betting on a LB. I'm also betting on more suspensions coming this season, and if they hit our NFC rivals oh boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

Blood is in the water. Women now know the environment is ripe for bringing up charges against NFL players. Gold diggers, escorts, ordinary women, they're all going to make their moves to nail dumb and or mentally ill NFL players. I just hope Hardy was the only problem on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seltzer
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Seltzer · Posted

      Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • tukafan21
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...