Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Extra point/ 2 Point Conversion Discussion


mpugh6

Recommended Posts

The article below highlights the three extra point/ 2 point conversion proposals to be voted on by the league. There will need to be 24 of 32 votes in agreement in order for a rule change to occur.

Which of these, if any, do you like? Do you want the rule to change at all? Which of these do you think would be best for the Panthers?

Proposals:

A)

Kicks from the 15 yd line

2 pt conversions from 2 yd line

Defense cannot score on turnover

Proposed by Patriots

B)

Kicks from the 15 yd line

2 pt conversions from 1 yd line

Defense has opportunity to score

Proposed by Eagles

C)

Kicks from the 15 yd line

2 pt conversion from 2 yd line

Defense has opportunity to score

Proposed by comp. committee

http://pro32.ap.org/article/3-proposals-extra-points-table-nfl-owners

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B or C, don't really care which. B probably helps us more since Cam can jump over the pile from the 1 for a conversion. Defenses should absolutely be able to score on a turnover so A is out of the question if it were me voting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think B woud be best for the Panthers, because of how big we are as a team. We have so many 1 yard plays available that have a high percentage chance of scoring.

The issue is, most teams would be able to do the same thing. If B is chosen, would that lead to a 2 point conversion all the time because of how easy it is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish they'd just leave it alone.  Option B would benefit us the best because we have cam, stew, and tolbert who are tough to stop for a yard.  Our ballhawking defense will also be a factor with their ability to score.  I just don't understand changing it just for the sake of changing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see the need for a change but if there were to be one, option C is the best overall. B would favor us the most with Tolbert smashing thru the middle and Cam's ability to scramble off the play action (or even sneak over the top). Plus Olsen, Funchess, KB, even Swole Bones on the jump ball end zone fade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...