Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The New Huddle


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

OK gang, some of you weren't around this weekend so I will get you caught up. 

 

I have dropped a boat load of $$ into this joint to upgrade the huddle software and a design to match. We now have a modern responsive theme that is over twice as fast according to google and other metrics. 

Feedback on the site has been overwhelmingly positive, especially the new web version. 

 

The App works, but is limited in it is functionality. As new versions are released I will keep upgrading it. 

 

There are still a few issues and the software developers are working on them. Including but not limited to:

- Issues with the huddle store and purchasing upgrades like all-pro. 

- Embedding things like youtubes and such

- lots of other little things that are getting fixed in the background. 

Everything should be running smoothly in the next week or so. We had over 5 gigs of data that is still being converted to this new system. It takes a while. 

 

Anywho, I hope you like the new site. It has taken up much of my time over the past couple of months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The price to trade for him, would likely completely bankrupt our future draft assets. I would have been all for a Hendrickson or Parsons trade in maybe 2017 or 2018. But this team is so far from being good and needs SO much help to build, those draft picks are almost priceless.  Let's not forget the insane cost it took to get Bryce and how much that harmed our drafting ability.
    • People like to say that, but I don't know if it's true. We went a few years trying to answer the QB question on the cheap amid bad coaching. We did what other teams do and tried to address QB by giving up a king's ransom and moving up. I mean, I guess that could be considered a "splash move," but I see it more as trying to draft the next big thing at QB.  I think that he's been more impatient than anything else. He gave too much power to Rhule who didn't know what the hell he was doing and relied on Fitterer who left a lot to be desired as well. Sure, we may have tried to get Watson and Stafford, but that's all a part of trying to answer the question at QB. "Splash moves?" maybe, but I think it's just business as usual for teams without a QB. Parsons would be a "splash move," but he's about as sure a thing that you could acquire for the capital. 
    • Yeah, not sure about that unless we really have a dominant offense, especially running game. If not.....then what was it worth?
×
×
  • Create New...