Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brenton Bersin continues to impress


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

some of you need to free yourselves of this bizarre mentality that some rando is going to come in to OTAs or camp and just be handed a roster spot over another guy who is entrenched at his spot on the depth chart and is liked by the quarterback and has some chemistry with him because he's faster or more "talented" or whatever.  maybe if he lights camp and the preseason on fire but that's not really that common for an UDFA/late round prospect and that's being generous.

you want to know what happens to guys who come in to the league fast, big, running great routes, and catching everything that gets near them?  they get drafted in the first round.  everybody that's fighting for a 4th or 5th spot on a wide receiver depth chart has some kind of deficiency.  in bersin's case it's because he's not particularly athletic or fast but he can catch, he runs solid routes, and our $100 million franchise quarterback likes throwing to him.  i think that gives him a leg up on a guy who's just fast or just talented or just has "upside".

take it up with rowboat ron.  or if you think it's jer bear's fault then quit lining his pockets by watching the panthers.

Edited by The NFL Shield At Midfield
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

​Damn, I forgot to put Brown in there.

Well, to update it then..

Benjamin - #1

Funchess - #2

Brown - #3

Ginn #4

Bersin #5

Cotchery or Byrd for #6

I don't really see that Cotchery makes it unless he absolutely balls out in camp/preseason. We need all the speed we can get.

We are pretty damn stacked at WR, I don't understand what there is to bitch about exactly.

Stacked?  No, definitely not.  Bersin has zero chance to earn a roster spot on a stacked WR roster.  I can understand why fans think it's stacked though.  We look like we may actually have the talent pool to field a legit NFL WR corps here in Carolina for the first time in a looooooong time.  But stacked?  No.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

​Dont give answers yet..do your research like you wanted to..you are going to have to give a reasonable number of examples in order to make a valid point.

They both were in the 3rd 4th 5th Wr range and had better  numbers.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stacked?  No, definitely not.  Bersin has zero chance to earn a roster spot on a stacked WR roster.  I can understand why fans think it's stacked though.  We look like we may actually have the talent pool to field a legit NFL WR corps here in Carolina for the first time in a looooooong time.  But stacked?  No.

I think you're applying a context to that word that was not my intention.

Not stacked as in top within the league. Stacked in terms of compared to what we have had at times since Newton first arrived.

Were we worried about having roster spots to fit all our WR's around this time last year?

Edited by TheRed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is light years ahead of last years group without a doubt. We paid cam big money. Give him the best and most diverse options on the field as possible. This is his offense.

 

honestly I don't want cotchery on the field

Just a question...  Who would you rather see get playing time.. Bersin Cotchery Byrd Hill or Boykins.. 

I rather see Hill or Byrd... 

Just do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a question...  Who would you rather see get playing time.. Bersin Cotchery Byrd Hill or Boykins.. 

I rather see Hill or Byrd... 

Just do

I don't know because there all playing in shorts and no pads. Byrds speed is intriguing but it ends there for right now. We need to see preseason games to get a better picture

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know because there all playing in shorts and no pads. Byrds speed is intriguing but it ends there for right now. We need to see preseason games to get a better picture

But you can have a idea of what you hope to have in a 4th and 5th Wr..  Do you want a possession guy or a potential game breaker? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you can have a idea of what you hope to have in a 4th and 5th Wr..  Do you want a possession guy or a potential game breaker? 

You are assuming they are game breakers before ever seeing them catch a pass as a Panther. Why? If any prove to be that then great. You've already decided though based on just hope. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I  want from my 4th and 5th Wr on the roster.. 

1. Special teams ace.. 

2. A specialist you can design plays and packages for.. 

3. A spot starter

4. A young development  player with skill sets to become a future starter.. 

 

Who on our roster fits any of these ccategories  best should make the team.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are assuming they are game breakers before ever seeing them catch a pass as a Panther. Why? If any prove to be that then great. You've already decided though based on just hope. 

Speed and or size can't be taught..  Route running and developing  better hands can be... 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I  want from my 4th and 5th Wr on the roster.. 

1. Special teams ace.. 

2. A specialist you can design plays and packages for.. 

3. A spot starter

4. A young development  player with skill sets to become a future starter.. 

 

Who on our roster fits any of these ccategories  best should make the team.. 

​In a perfect nfl world, yes you would want that. but there are other teams that would be making the same mistake you claim the panthers would be making if bersin was somehow to make the team yet again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...