Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear NFL: Bring Back the Fullback


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

For fans of smash mouth football, the demise of the punishing NFL fullback has had a negative impact on maximum game enjoyment. Gone are the days of a 250lb work horse demolishing a linebacker as he paves the way to the end zone. Yes, I miss the blocking fullback. If you would frequently find yourself zoning in on a crushing block instead of the ball crossing the goal line, you probably miss them too. 

It seems we are not alone...

 

 

As PFF noted, fullbacks have become a thing of the past. But could that change? 

Over the past decade, defenses have adjusted both physically and within their schemes to defend against the offensives without fullbacks. Linebackers have gotten smaller, faster. More defensive sub-packages are being used than ever. Across the league the typical 4-3 is giving way to hybrid nickel and other formations. Teams are less worried about their linebackers getting dominated physically, but being out run. 

It is my contention that now may be the perfect time to bring back the punishing fullback, before defenses can easily adjust to them. 

A few weeks ago I was promoting Lee Ward as a guy on the Carolina Panthers roster that could immediately fill this role. Ward is a pure blocking specialist, almost perfect in technique. A quick look at his highlight reel from college will get any red blooded American football fan excited. 

Also, Panthers offensive coordinator Mike Shula does have experience with this type of player. As offensive coordinator in Tampa Bay, Shula utilized all time fullback great Lorenzo Neal as a blocking specialist, paving the way for the shifty Warrick Dunn and also for Mike Alstott in their rhino package. 

Could we see Ward in the same role in Carolina? Imagine him blocking for Jordan Todman, or perhaps on the goal line in front of Mike Tolbert. 

What say you Panthers fans... Are you ready for the blocking fullback to return? 



View full article

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a mack truck waiting in the wings. Shula should know how to use the kid since they had a bruiser in Tampa Bay. We will see what happens Add Tolbert,Stew, and Cam to the mix and you have a wrecking crew to deal with.

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I don't see it as a priority

 

people thought there would be a rush of teams following the Seahawks power football formula after 2013, yet that hasn't really happened at all. I'd rather like to see the panthers work on their red zone offense and no huddle/2 minute drills because that's where they have the most room for improvement. The offense needs to be able to function in fourth gear if we find ourselves behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I don't see it as a priority

 

people thought there would be a rush of teams following the Seahawks power football formula after 2013, yet that hasn't really happened at all. I'd rather like to see the panthers work on their red zone offense and no huddle/2 minute drills because that's where they have the most room for improvement. The offense needs to be able to function in fourth gear if we find ourselves behind.

Red zone touchdowns should be a #1 priority this season. A blocking fullback could be a part of the solution. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big problem with blocking fullbacks is the same as the problem with blocking tight ends: they can't catch worth crap. Having a blocking fullback or tight end on field is a dead giveaway you are going to run the ball, unless you keep him on the field the whole game, which necessarily limits your quarterback's ability to throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be all for that poo.  Too much focus on our passing game to begin with.  We try to be a run first offense anyway, and this would only help that... in a tremendous way.  You get defenses worried about a guy like Ward coming out of the backfield, with the receiving corps we have(err, think we'll have), and I believe panic will be widespread.  Most defenses won't have the personnel to compensate.  It opens up a poo ton of options, because they will have to focus on trying to stop it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big problem with blocking fullbacks is the same as the problem with blocking tight ends: they can't catch worth crap. Having a blocking fullback or tight end on field is a dead giveaway you are going to run the ball, unless you keep him on the field the whole game, which necessarily limits your quarterback's ability to throw.

Not necessarily.  You would still have two wide receivers, Olsen, and your running back on the field.  That's four options right there.  If the FB has any ability to catch a pass, you win.

Edited by Nick_81
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would we be even talking about this if we were not in a position to use/capitalize on such a thing?

 

Great if it happens, but let me ask the usual questions here on thhe hudddle.

 

Can he play LT?

Can we trust Shula to use such talent?

 

 

Now that the obligatory peanut gallery crap is out of the way, I would totally LOVE of such to come to pass!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...