Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Nation's Offseason Grades


pantherphan96

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/14241/cam-newton-extension-gives-panthers-solid-offseason-grade

David Newton gives the Panthers a B. The best move? Cam's extension.

By committing to Newton early with a deal that for the most part is salary-cap-friendly, the Panthers can focus on improving the roster around Newton and locking up other key players such as linebacker Luke Kuechly. Newton can focus on improving mechanics that have kept him from being an elite quarterback without worry about his future. Newton assures Carolina has at worst a top-15 quarterback -- and potentially a top-10 one -- through 2020. Playoff teams typically have stability at quarterback. Carolina has stability now.

Riskiest move? Oher.

Oher hasn't played a full season at left tackle since the 2012 season at Baltimore. He struggled the past two seasons at right tackle between the Ravens (2013) and Tennessee Titans (2014)... It’s still a gamble when you consider Oher has to protect the blind side of Newton, who has been hit almost twice as many times as any other quarterback in the NFL since 2011.

Also mentions the battle for Greg Hardy's spot, with a mention of Big Frank and Ealy possibly battling it out for said spot.

 

The other NFC South rivals received similar grades:

Falcons: B (http://espn.go.com/blog/atlanta-falcons/post/_/id/14045/addition-of-pass-rusher-vic-beasley-helps-give-atlanta-falcons-solid-offseason-grade)

Bucs: A- (http://espn.go.com/blog/tampa-bay-buccaneers/post/_/id/10130/jameis-winston-helps-buccaneers-earn-high-grade)

Saints: B- (http://espn.go.com/blog/new-orleans-saints/post/_/id/15952/trading-jimmy-graham-hurts-offseason-grade-but-saints-get-credit-for-being-bold)

 

Other interesting grades:

Steelers received a B+ with the signing of DeAngelo being their best move.

(http://espn.go.com/blog/pittsburgh-steelers/post/_/id/14254/steelers-have-b-offseason-after-deangelo-williams-signing-waiting-to-address-secondary-concerns) 

 

The 49ers somehow received a C- (for the perceived enthusiasm of their OTAs) despite losing half their roster.

(http://espn.go.com/blog/san-francisco-49ers/tag/_/name/2015-nfl-offseason-grades)

 

The whole AFC West received a B, while the defending champ Patriots received a C. Packers received the highest grade (A) with the Vikings, Bengals, Dolphins, and Redskins (????) right behind them, all receiving an A-. The Browns received a C- for their offseason, with their best WR out for the year, Manziel in and out of rehab, and McCown in line to be their starter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Oher risky? We paid him pretty much nothing. Yes we don't know whether he'll be good, but he's a no risk high reward guy. There were no FAs out there we could've signed to be our LT and nobody in the draft at our spots so he was the only option, and he came cheap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Oher risky? We paid him pretty much nothing. Yes we don't know whether he'll be good, but he's a no risk high reward guy. There were no FAs out there we could've signed to be our LT and nobody in the draft at our spots so he was the only option, and he came cheap. 

Because he might suck I suppose? Seems a bit lazy..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The risk is not the signing of Oher. The risk is going into the season with another as our main LT option. I don think there was another feasible option this offseason though.

Yeah I totally agree. I was mocking that writer for being lazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who else were we supposed to sign at left tackle?

It's true I don't think there were many other FA options out there.  And I feel like it's almost a damn certainty the Panthers would have drafted DJ Humphries if the Cardinals didn't snag him one spot ahead of the Panthers.  Just didn't line up again this offseason.  Now watch Gettleman double down at tackle next draft haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Oher risky? We paid him pretty much nothing. Yes we don't know whether he'll be good, but he's a no risk high reward guy. There were no FAs out there we could've signed to be our LT and nobody in the draft at our spots so he was the only option, and he came cheap. 

entrusting a guy who got cut from the least talented team in football after one year to play LT to protect your $100 mil QB is risky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

entrusting a guy who got cut from the least talented team in football after one year to play LT to protect your $100 mil QB is risky

Not when there are absolutely zero other options. If we chose to take a chance on him over some other free agent who could've come in and been a clear cut solid player at LT, then I'd agree. But it's not risky when there's just no other options at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 6 pages of tuka and Seltzer arguing is actually 97 pages long
    • 100%. And these same people will claim you have an agenda. You can't have it every way. We had the lowest rated defense in the league last year. Statistically the worst ever. By PFF grades (for whatever that's worth- but they are readily accepted, used, and conveyed by most "reputable" sources), the defense was the worst ever. Not only that, PFF rated our receiving corp the worst in football last season. The absolute worst... out of 32 teams. Which is why regardless of the lip service Canales and Morgan paid to the current guys, they knew it would be criminal not to give Bryce more help. People fixating on team stats and not taking these things into context are stupid, plain and simple, and I'm for one thankful they're not running this team (or probably anything for that matter bc they obviously can't discern reality. Again, going back to the eyeball test these Narrative Nancies seem to hate so much, did they not see the windows Bryce was putting balls into? Have the generally not watched much NFL? Please, please show me the film where all these NFL QBs are making throws like this to this point Bryce was "below average" down the stretch compared to them. Bryce made more wow throws in that 3 game stretch of the Bucs, Chiefs, and Eagles than every other QB combined in all the years since since Cam got hurt I genuinely am baffled by people that can watch throws like that and act like it's nothing. I guarantee you Steve Spagnola, Todd Bowles, and and Vic Fangio didn't think it was nothing after watching the little guy torch them with players those teams would be embarrassed to trot out at the skill position players. The national media spent all year making excuses for Mahomes not having elite weapons when he had multiple 1st & 2nd round talents at the skill positions along with future HoFers in Kelce and Hopkins. Bryce wasn't throwing for 300 yards every week with David Moore and Adam Theilen in spite of jaw dropping throws and you want to say the guy played below average. For those people, again, we ain't watching the same sport. And the name calling doesn't change that... The vitriol and projection... it's off the effing charts with these people.  
    • "Well you see if you remove this terrible game that terrible game this other terrible game and then focus on these games you'll see he's actually one of the better QB's in the league and he's actually as good as Jayden Daniels". My god this place is delusional. I love it.
×
×
  • Create New...