Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LB Justin Houston signs 101 millon 6 year deal


Jmac

Recommended Posts

So about CJ's contract...

not too bad huh?

Apart from JJ Watt, Justin Houston is probably the best pass rusher in the league. He led the league in sacks last year with 22 and has 3 straight years with double digit sacks. He got paid what he deserved IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think Luke will take an active role in his contract talks. He seems more like a "let my agent handle that" kind of guy.

Unfortunately, that probably isnt a good thing for us.

That'd be Tom Condon and unfortunately you're right.  I have ZERO concerns about a deal getting done, but it will be "fair" and Condon will get his.  With the 5th year option we also have a trump card the Seahawks don't have, although I wish the deal would be done sooner than later myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I dont think Luke will take an active role in his contract talks. He seems more like a "let my agent handle that" kind of guy.

Unfortunately, that probably isnt a good thing for us.

Is it smart for a Player like Luke to play an Active Role in a Contract? Or is it better for his Agent? I mean of course his agent is going to expect more because he gets a cut, and wants to make sure he is representing his client to the fullest potential. However, Couldn't Luke tell his Agent look im only expecting "X" a year, so don't worry about trying to get Max.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from JJ Watt, Justin Houston is probably the best pass rusher in the league. He led the league in sacks last year with 22 and has 3 straight years with double digit sacks. He got paid what he deserved IMO

I'm not sure what this means?  I know Houston is good at what he does and his contract is earned.  

CJ got paid 30mil less than that, has averaged double digit sacks over the past 5 years, plays tough against the run and is a leader on this team.  

I was just pointing out to the bean counters around here that our very own CJ is worth the money.  How it was structured is up for debate but I digress.  CJ rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is it smart for a Player like Luke to play an Active Role in a Contract? Or is it better for his Agent? I mean of course his agent is going to expect more because he gets a cut, and wants to make sure he is representing his client to the fullest potential. However, Couldn't Luke tell his Agent look im only expecting "X" a year, so don't worry about trying to get Max.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I personally think that would be foolish for Luke to do. The landscape is constantly changing with new contracts, rising salary caps, etc so "X" a year might sound ok now, but might be way under his market value as arguably the best MLB in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...