Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Oher vs Frank Alexander


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

This is a good thread.

I've been thinking about the OLine situation this year compared to last year.  On another site I was reading discussion of Oher and the OT situation and there was the usual type of stuff:

"God I hope there are some roster cuts and we can pick up someone better"

"I trust GMan to find an adequate backup. Someone will cut one as Training Camp and the Preseason wind down."

"But we said that LAST YEAR and look how THAT turned out"

 

But I think we are already in a FAR better place with the OLine this year than last year for a couple of reasons:

1) 1st & most importantly, we've got our starting line up, and they've got time to gel.  We know who our starting 5 are.  Oher, Norwell, Kalil, Turner, Remmers.  Whatever rotation is going to be tried, it will be among the backups, not the starters.  This is huge.  I forget how many weeks it was before we knew who would start on the OLine last year.  It was constant juggling around in the preseason & during the season.  Oher mentioned something in an interview yesterday about not being comfortable with all the individual attention on him, that for the OLine guys, it's all about the line as a group and working together.  This year our line has time to learn how to do that.

2) Oher > Bell.  All I've seen so far seems to make that clear.

3) We're not remaking three position groups, that gives the coaches a chance to focus more on Oline.  G'man talked about the challenge last year of remaking 3 entire position groups:  Oline, WRs. DB.  I think that stretches the staff.  They can't just focus on one position of need, they've got lots of fires to fight.  Right now, we are pretty dang solid on almost all positions except OT.  Figuring out a plan to get us greater depth on OT can become G'man's highest focus.

Sure, we're pretty dangerously thin on OT.  In the wake of the Martin mess, I'm not happy to be relying on Chandler or Amini as backup... but last year they were being tried out to START.  And yes, our OLine backup depth is a bit weak across the board, though D. Williams shows promise.

BUT HAVING AN OBVIOUS STARTING 5 FROM DAY 1 OF TC IS HUGE.  I predict it will make a world of difference to the line's play this year.  And 4/5ths of that starting line up played together and played pretty well in the stretch run last season.  We've got something to work with here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah,  I call it for Oher...  He never lost him and stayed engaged the entire time.  At the very least, on a real play with Cam back there, it gives Cam time to step up or get rid of the ball versus with Bell, he would've been picking himself up off the ground by the end of this play. 

What stood out to me for some reason though, is man, Oher looks pretty small in that video...  Looks much trimmer than I would've expected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is like the Zapruder tape. If you watch their feet, and the flag on the ground, it looks like Oher keeps Alexander pretty north-south, running back in a straight line until he's out of the play. The pictures later in the thread seem to back it up. I think Oher does a nice job here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...