Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guys, Corey Can Be Our #1!


t96

Recommended Posts

I absolutely hate when people refer to Olsen as our 1. If he was our 1 before KB got hurt,   then he is our 1 now.  He's a TE for crying out loud.  He's a very good one at that,  but he isn't our WR1.  

As for any WR not named Funchess (and I am seriously skeptical about that his rookie season), Lord help us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely hate when people refer to Olsen as our 1. If he was our 1 before KB got hurt,   then he is our 1 now.  He's a TE for crying out loud.  He's a very good one at that,  but he isn't our WR1.  

As for any WR not named Funchess (and I am seriously skeptical about that his rookie season), Lord help us. 

The way I see #1 and #2 and #3, etc. is by the amount of targets. I include TEs in that, but you could choose not to. The #1 receiver on a team is the one who gets the most targets. KB led the team in targets with 24 more than Olsen last year, so in my eyes he is the #1. Olsen will probably lead the team in targets next year which would make him our #1. I'd guess Funchess after him then Brown then a tossup between Ginn, Cotch and Dickson even. Pretty worried about our passing attack this year. Going to have to really really hope Stew can play a whole season and our line can hold up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All it's going to take is one of our guys to step up and the rest to do as well as they did last year and we will be fine.  Funchass coming in and doing no less than one might expect as a 2nd round rookie and I'll be happy.  If he does better than that it is just a bonus.

 

No need for doom and gloom yet.  I'll wait till the 2nd Monday after the bye week to start panicking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...