Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't forget the 2013 J.Boykin


Jmac

Recommended Posts

.When the Packers where desimated with injuries all season long with Cobb,Jones and Finely missing games, this guy came in and met the challenge. When Rodgers went down he still produced. 2014 he took a backseat to a WR corp that is one of the best in the league. He has shown that the pressure isn't to much for him when called upon. Playing well on a Superbowl caliber team is something to be considered. We are one more injury away from this WR  corps being total crap. This guy needs to get his chance and stick.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boykin is our 2nd best WR we can only hope the coaching staff is actually hiding that fact and plan on starting him week 1 opposite Funchess.....

What's also hard to forget is...Smitty...with him here we'd be in fantastic shape...4-94-1 63 yard TD last game...it's still sickening.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

Nobody here has "agenda driven, ulterior motives."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

I always enjoy reading you post about others having an agenda. Worth a quality chuckle at least.

Nobody knows which Boykin is the real Boykin at this point. He may get the opportunity to show us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just really don't understand the financial/lockeroom part of the whole Smitty thing still, do you?

I understand everything my post was about how much his loss has hurt our offense(we have no explosive players at the skill positions)...nowhere did I say anything about why or how he was released. Smitty was/is an all time fan favorite/best player his loss still sucks...dood did get into another fight in the preseason...he may be getting "worse" in that regard as he ages...he seems to give even less fugs than he used to.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always enjoy reading you post about others having an agenda. Worth a quality chuckle at least.

Nobody knows which Boykin is the real Boykin at this point. He may get the opportunity to show us.

Boykin had barely any playing time in either of those years.  Hardly any! So if someone bases anything on those two years in and of themselves, then they just aren't that smart.  If you take his numbers in their totality, which is the smarter and generally accepted means of evaluation (not to mention taking things like injury into account),  then you get a clearer picture.  It's that simple. 

I can accept anyone telling me that Boykin is a JAG,  or that Boykin is a WR4 at best,  but don't tell me that he sucks based on 2014 or 2012 because it makes little sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boykin had barely any playing time in either of those years.  Hardly any! So if someone bases anything on those two years in and of themselves, then they just aren't that smart.  If you take his numbers in their totality, which is the smarter and generally accepted means of evaluation (not to mention taking things like injury into account),  then you get a clearer picture.  It's that simple. 

I can accept anyone telling me that Boykin is a JAG,  or that Boykin is a WR4 at best,  but don't tell me that he sucks based on 2014 or 2012 because it makes little sense. 

You know I have to bust your chops a little.

I don't think he sucks. Considering our options right now at the position, I'm willing to give just about anyone a shot at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...